IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v5y1957i3p319-350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Civil Defense Problems in the Nation's Capital Following Widespread Thermonuclear Attack

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Bentz

    (Operations Research Office, The Johns Hopkins University, Chevy Chase, Maryland)

  • William Chace

    (Operations Research Office, The Johns Hopkins University, Chevy Chase, Maryland)

  • Gordon Doerfer

    (Operations Research Office, The Johns Hopkins University, Chevy Chase, Maryland)

  • John Donaldson

    (Operations Research Office, The Johns Hopkins University, Chevy Chase, Maryland)

  • Thomas English

    (Operations Research Office, The Johns Hopkins University, Chevy Chase, Maryland)

  • James Graves

    (Operations Research Office, The Johns Hopkins University, Chevy Chase, Maryland)

  • Paul Grim

    (Operations Research Office, The Johns Hopkins University, Chevy Chase, Maryland)

  • David Gunlock

    (Operations Research Office, The Johns Hopkins University, Chevy Chase, Maryland)

  • Jerome Horowitz

    (Operations Research Office, The Johns Hopkins University, Chevy Chase, Maryland)

  • Leland Miller

    (Operations Research Office, The Johns Hopkins University, Chevy Chase, Maryland)

  • Albert Small

    (Operations Research Office, The Johns Hopkins University, Chevy Chase, Maryland)

Abstract

The probable conditions in Washington following widespread thermonuclear attack are assessed with respect to (1) radiation conditions in the city itself and in the surrounding areas, and (2) deaths and debris conditions in the Nation's Capital Mock attacks with thermonuclear-size bombs were made on all targets designated as critical by the FCDA within a 300-mile radius of Washington. Appropriate fallout contours were selected and oriented as to wind speed and bearing for each target. The attacks were repeated 36 times using a random sample of actual 60,000-ft wind readings. Radiation levels for the area were then compiled in terms of the per cent of time a given two-day accumulated dose would be exceeded. An attack day was selected at random and the effects of blast heat and local (close-in) fallout in Washington were added to indirect radiation effects. A comparison of the amount of time a rescue worker would have to wait (impeded by debris and radiation) to enter an area with the amount of time left to a survivor in shelter attenuating 0.9 of radiation effects was made. An area exists, in Virginia, where less than 200 r can be expected a large per cent of the time. A very small percentage of the target population will survive to be cared for in this area. It was found that present shelter is not adequate to prevent intolerable numbers of deaths Present “evacuation areas” should be re-evaluated in terms of likely radiation conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Bentz & William Chace & Gordon Doerfer & John Donaldson & Thomas English & James Graves & Paul Grim & David Gunlock & Jerome Horowitz & Leland Miller & Albert Small, 1957. "Some Civil Defense Problems in the Nation's Capital Following Widespread Thermonuclear Attack," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 319-350, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:5:y:1957:i:3:p:319-350
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.5.3.319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.5.3.319
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.5.3.319?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:5:y:1957:i:3:p:319-350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.