IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v45y1997i4p508-520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cellular Manufacturing: A Statistical Review of the Literature (1965–1995)

Author

Listed:
  • Arnold Reisman

    (Reisman and Associates, Shaker Heights, Ohio)

  • Ashok Kumar

    (Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan)

  • Jaideep Motwani

    (Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan)

  • Chun Hung Cheng

    (The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

Abstract

This paper is both an extension and an expansion of two earlier studies concerned with the direction of OR/MS research as reported in its archival literature (Reisman and Kirschnick [Reisman, A., F. Kirshnick. 1994. The devolution of OR/MS: Implications from a statistical content analysis of papers in flagship journals. Opns. Res. 42 (4) 577–588], [Reisman, A., F. Kirshnick. 1995. Research strategies used by OR/MS workers as shown by an analysis of papers in flagship journals. Opns. Res. 43 (5) 731–739.]). All of these papers provide a content analysis of the OR/MS archival journals. However, this paper focuses on the entire life-cycle literature of Cellular Manufacturing as a module of OR/MS. It addresses the research strategy employed by, and the theory-vs-applied orientation exhibited by, the authors. In all, 235 articles, starting in 1969, were reviewed and classified on a five-point scale, ranging from pure theory to bonafide applications. Secondly, the articles were classified in terms of seven types of research processes used by authors. Next, statistical correlations were performed relating data from the above classifications. The findings show that the literature is dominated (94 papers, or 40%) by articles classified as pure theory using synthetic “data” and the ripple or incremental process as a basic research strategy.During the first decade of cellular manufacturing research (1969 through 1978) this subset accounted for but 4 out of 42 (or 9.5%) of the papers published, whereas during the most recent decade it accounted for 81 papers (or 47.4%) of the literature. Lastly, the article raises questions about the future of cellular manufacturing research vis-à-vis other related subject matter.

Suggested Citation

  • Arnold Reisman & Ashok Kumar & Jaideep Motwani & Chun Hung Cheng, 1997. "Cellular Manufacturing: A Statistical Review of the Literature (1965–1995)," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 508-520, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:45:y:1997:i:4:p:508-520
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.45.4.508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.45.4.508
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.45.4.508?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. S Gattoufi & M Oral & A Kumar & A Reisman, 2004. "Content analysis of data envelopment analysis literature and its comparison with that of other OR/MS fields," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(9), pages 911-935, September.
    2. A. Attila İşlier, 2015. "Cellular Manufacturing Systems: Organization, Trends and Innovative Methods," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 3(2), pages 13-26, December.
    3. Arnold Reisman & Muhittin Oral, 2005. "Soft Systems Methodology: A Context Within a 50-Year Retrospective of OR/MS," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 164-178, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:45:y:1997:i:4:p:508-520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.