IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v45y1997i2p178-187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

OR/MS Publications: Extension of the Analysis of U.S. Flagship Journals to the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Ormerod

    (University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom)

  • Ioannis Kiossis

    (University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom)

Abstract

Reisman and Kirschnick (Reisman, A., F. Kirschnick. 1994. The devolution of OR/MS: Implications from a statistical content analysis of papers in flagship journals. Opns. Res. 42 577–588.) have analysed United States Flagship OR/MS Journals over a thirty-year period using statistical content analysis. We have applied their method of analysis, which seeks to distinguish between the space devoted to theory on the one hand and that devoted to applications on the other, to journals based in the United Kingdom. Using their definitions we have classified articles published in the Journal of the Operational Research Society (previously OR Quarterly ), OMEGA , and OR Insight over the period from 1962 to 1994 to parallel their study. As well as shedding some light on the direction that OR/MS is taking in the United Kingdom, comparison is made with trends in the United States. Further, the European Journal of Operational Research has also been included in the analysis, adding a European dimension. The country of affiliation of the authors has been analysed, providing data on the publishing habits of U.S. authors in the United Kingdom and European-based journals. This casts new light on the findings of Reisman and Kirschnick (Reisman, A., F. Kirschnick. 1994. The devolution of OR/MS: Implications from a statistical content analysis of papers in flagship journals. Opns. Res. 42 577–588.). Finally, the paper contributes to the debate about the current state and future direction of OR/MS.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Ormerod & Ioannis Kiossis, 1997. "OR/MS Publications: Extension of the Analysis of U.S. Flagship Journals to the United Kingdom," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 178-187, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:45:y:1997:i:2:p:178-187
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.45.2.178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.45.2.178
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.45.2.178?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ranyard, J.C. & Fildes, R. & Hu, Tun-I, 2015. "Reassessing the scope of OR practice: The Influences of Problem Structuring Methods and the Analytics Movement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 1-13.
    2. R J Ormerod, 2010. "Research contribution: Citation and content analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(4), pages 705-707, April.
    3. Chiang Kao, 2009. "The authorship and country spread of Operation Research journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(3), pages 397-407, March.
    4. Hajime Eto, 2000. "Authorship and Citation Patterns in Operational Research Journals in Relation to Competition and Reform," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 47(1), pages 25-42, January.
    5. S J E Taylor & T Eldabi & G Riley & R J Paul & M Pidd, 2009. "Simulation modelling is 50! Do we need a reality check?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 69-82, May.
    6. Vastag, Gyula & Montabon, Frank, 2002. "Journal characteristics, rankings and social acculturation in operations management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 109-126, April.
    7. Merigó, José M. & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2017. "A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 37-48.
    8. Sigifredo Laengle & José M. Merigó & Nikunja Mohan Modak & Jian-Bo Yang, 2020. "Bibliometrics in operations research and management science: a university analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 769-813, November.
    9. Donohue, Joan M. & Fox, Jeremy B., 2000. "A multi-method evaluation of journals in the decision and management sciences by US academics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 17-36, February.
    10. Meltem Denizel & Behlul Usdiken & Deniz Tuncalp, 2003. "Drift or Shift? Continuity, Change, and International Variation in Knowledge Production in OR/MS," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 711-720, October.
    11. Liao, Huchang & Tang, Ming & Li, Zongmin & Lev, Benjamin, 2019. "Bibliometric analysis for highly cited papers in operations research and management science from 2008 to 2017 based on Essential Science Indicators," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 223-236.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:45:y:1997:i:2:p:178-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.