IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v41y1993i4p625-640.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Natural Drift: What Happened to Operations Research?

Author

Listed:
  • Charles J. Corbett

    (INSEAD (The European Institute of Business Administration), Fontainebleau, France)

  • Luk N. Van Wassenhove

    (INSEAD (The European Institute of Business Administration), Fontainebleau, France)

Abstract

“Crisis? What crisis?” could also have been an appropriate title for this paper. The OR/MS literature contains more than enough papers addressing the crisis in OR/MS to take the matter seriously, but it is not always clear exactly what is meant by crisis. The complaints usually concern the perceived gap between theory and practice, pointing out that there are too many theoretical and too few practice-oriented papers. This may well be true, but we suggest a slightly different view of the crisis, by hypothesizing that a ‘natural drift’ has occurred, i.e., that old-style OR has remained underdeveloped relative to its more purely theoretical and practical counterparts. To explain how this hypothesis arose, we provide an overview of the debate on professional concerns in OR/MS, and contrast it with Harvard Business Review papers providing a managerial perspective. We also explore the extent to which such a natural drift would be truly natural, by comparing the development of OR/MS to that of other professions. We arrive at a mixed conclusion. All is not well, but all is not lost either.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles J. Corbett & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 1993. "The Natural Drift: What Happened to Operations Research?," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 625-640, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:41:y:1993:i:4:p:625-640
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.41.4.625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.41.4.625
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.41.4.625?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:41:y:1993:i:4:p:625-640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.