IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v40y1992i5p1018-1022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Criterion for Comparing Strength of Preference with an Application to Bargaining

Author

Listed:
  • Hans Peters

    (University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

A criterion called “improving faster than” is proposed and characterized to compare the strength or preference of value functions. The result can be applied in decision models where no risk is involved or, at least, explicitly modeled. A bargaining theory example illustrates the criterion.

Suggested Citation

  • Hans Peters, 1992. "A Criterion for Comparing Strength of Preference with an Application to Bargaining," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(5), pages 1018-1022, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:40:y:1992:i:5:p:1018-1022
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.40.5.1018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.40.5.1018
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.40.5.1018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Driesen, Bram & Lombardi, Michele & Peters, Hans, 2016. "Feasible sets, comparative risk aversion, and comparative uncertainty aversion in bargaining," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 162-170.
    2. Maria Gallego, David Scoones, 2005. "The Art of Compromise," Working Papers eg0042, Wilfrid Laurier University, Department of Economics, revised 2005.
    3. Kobberling, Veronika & Peters, Hans, 2003. "The effect of decision weights in bargaining problems," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 154-175, May.
    4. Cressman, Ross & Gallego, Maria, 2009. "On the ranking of bilateral bargaining opponents," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 64-83, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:40:y:1992:i:5:p:1018-1022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.