IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v37y1989i4p664-672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

OR Forum—The Next Decade in Operations Research: Comments on the Condor Report

Author

Listed:
  • Harvey M. Wagner

    (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina)

  • Michael H. Rothkopf

    (Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey)

  • Clayton J. Thomas

    (Headquarters, US Air Force, Washington, DC)

  • Hugh J. Miser

    (Farmington, Connecticut)

Abstract

Under the sponsorship of the Systems Theory and Operations Research (STOR) Program of the National Science Foundation, a Committee on the Next Decade in Operations Research (CONDOR) held a 3-day workshop in mid-1987. The report of this committee appeared a year later in Operations Research (pp. 619–637). In view of the importance of this subject, and because CONDOR had, a fortiori , to limit its considerations to a number of important ones of primary interest to its members, a number of other OR analysts of widely different experience were asked to comment on this report. Four of the responses are presented below.

Suggested Citation

  • Harvey M. Wagner & Michael H. Rothkopf & Clayton J. Thomas & Hugh J. Miser, 1989. "OR Forum—The Next Decade in Operations Research: Comments on the Condor Report," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 664-672, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:37:y:1989:i:4:p:664-672
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.37.4.664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.37.4.664
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.37.4.664?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Shubik, 2002. "Game Theory and Operations Research: Some Musings 50 Years Later," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 192-196, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    professional: OR/MS philosophy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:37:y:1989:i:4:p:664-672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.