IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v29y1981i1p189-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Concurrent Task Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Errol L. Lloyd

    (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania)

Abstract

We study minimum execution time scheduling of computer task systems where each task may require control of several processors during each step of its execution. Such a task system consists of: m identical processors, tasks T 1 , …, T n , and a partial order on those tasks which represents precedence constraints. Associated with each task T 1 is a positive integral execution time τ 1 and a degree of concurrency q 1 ∈ (C-script) where (C-script) ⊆ {1, …, m }. Task T 1 must execute for τ 1 , steps and for each of those τ 1 steps it requires q 1 processors. Minimum length schedules for systems in which all task execution times are equal (concurrent UET task systems) are studied. Three sets of results are given. First, we show that scheduling concurrent UET task systems is NP-complete even if there are only three processors and each task has a degree of concurrency of either 1 or 2. Secondly, given any concurrent UET task system let r be the maximum degree of concurrency of any task. We show that the ratio of the length of an arbitrary list schedule for that system compared to the length of an optimal schedule is bounded above by (2 m − r )/( m − r + 1). We also show that the ratio ⌊(2 m − r )/( m − r + 1 )⌋ is achievable. Finally, we give an algorithm which produces optimal schedules for concurrent UET task systems on two processors.

Suggested Citation

  • Errol L. Lloyd, 1981. "Concurrent Task Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 189-201, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:29:y:1981:i:1:p:189-201
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.29.1.189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.29.1.189
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.29.1.189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Keqin Li, 1999. "Analysis of the List Scheduling Algorithm for Precedence Constrained Parallel Tasks," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 73-88, July.
    2. Roland Braune, 2022. "Packing-based branch-and-bound for discrete malleable task scheduling," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 675-704, December.
    3. Dolgui, Alexandre & Kovalev, Sergey & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y. & Malyutin, Sergey & Soukhal, Ameur, 2018. "Optimal workforce assignment to operations of a paced assembly line," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 200-211.
    4. Blazewicz, Jacek & Liu, Zhen, 2002. "Linear and quadratic algorithms for scheduling chains and opposite chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 248-264, March.
    5. Oguz, C. & Fikret Ercan, M. & Edwin Cheng, T. C. & Fung, Y. F., 2003. "Heuristic algorithms for multiprocessor task scheduling in a two-stage hybrid flow-shop," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(2), pages 390-403, September.
    6. Oguz, Ceyda & Zinder, Yakov & Ha Do, Van & Janiak, Adam & Lichtenstein, Maciej, 2004. "Hybrid flow-shop scheduling problems with multiprocessor task systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(1), pages 115-131, January.
    7. Blazwicz, Jacek & Liu, Zhen, 1996. "Scheduling multiprocessor tasks with chain constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 231-241, October.
    8. Wu, Lingxiao & Wang, Shuaian, 2018. "Exact and heuristic methods to solve the parallel machine scheduling problem with multi-processor tasks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 26-40.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:29:y:1981:i:1:p:189-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.