IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v26y1978i6p1010-1019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Probabilistic Model of Winners' Outs versus Losers' Outs Rules in Basketball

Author

Listed:
  • S. Christian Albright

    (Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana)

  • Wayne Winston

    (Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana)

Abstract

We examine what happens to the game of basketball when one of the principal rules is changed. When a team scores a basket, we assume this team receives the ball on the next possession, a rule we call “winners' out.” This is, of course, the opposite of the usual “losers' outs” rule, where the opposite team receives the next possession. The implications of this rule are studied in the game where the first team to score a certain number of points wins and also in the game where the team that is ahead at the buzzer wins. In both games the main result, surprisingly, is that the probability that a given team wins remains essentially constant under the two sets of rules. That is, neither team should really care which set of rules is in effect.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Christian Albright & Wayne Winston, 1978. "A Probabilistic Model of Winners' Outs versus Losers' Outs Rules in Basketball," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1010-1019, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:26:y:1978:i:6:p:1010-1019
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.26.6.1010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.26.6.1010
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.26.6.1010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M B Wright, 2009. "50 years of OR in sport," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 161-168, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:26:y:1978:i:6:p:1010-1019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.