IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v24y1976i5p951-972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utility Structure of a Medical Decision-Making Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey P. Krischer

    (The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland)

Abstract

This paper investigates the utility structure of decision outcomes in the treatment of cleft lip and cleft palate. Utilities are assessed by questionnaire from 119 individuals representing 13 clinical specialties, as well as members of the families of cleft lip and palate children. The results of the survey demonstrate the validity of certain utility independence assumptions used to simplify the assessment of multiattribute utility functions. We found significant differences in utilities among clinicians, grouped according to their specialty and the treatment facility to which they are affiliated. Members of the families of cleft lip and palate children also differed with certain clinical specialty groups. The paper concludes with a discussion of the differences in the assessed utility functions and their implications for clinical decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey P. Krischer, 1976. "Utility Structure of a Medical Decision-Making Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 951-972, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:24:y:1976:i:5:p:951-972
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.24.5.951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.24.5.951
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.24.5.951?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ralph L. Keeney & Robin S. Gregory, 2005. "Selecting Attributes to Measure the Achievement of Objectives," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 1-11, February.
    2. Kwak, Seung-Jun & Yoo, Seung-Hoon & Kim, Tai-Yoo, 2001. "A constructive approach to air-quality valuation in Korea," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 327-344, September.
    3. Scott B. Cantor, 2004. "Clinical Applications in the Decision Analysis Literature," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 23-25, March.
    4. Parton, Kevin A., 1979. "The Use Of A Decision Maker'S Utility Function In A Linear Programming Analysis Of Agricultural Policy," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 23(3), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Abraham Mehrez & Amiram Gafni, 1989. "Quality-adjusted Life Years, Utility Theory, and Healthy-years Equivalents," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 9(2), pages 142-149, June.
    6. Ralph L. Keeney, 1999. "The Value of Internet Commerce to the Customer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 533-542, April.
    7. G. Anthony Gorry & Thelma Jean Goodrich, 1978. "On the Role of Values in Program Evaluation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 2(4), pages 561-572, November.
    8. Catherine Buron & Catherine Le Galès & Anne-Marie Fericelli, 1997. "L'indicateur QALYs à la lumière de la théorie de l'utilité espérée multi-attribut explicitement décomposée," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 129(3), pages 55-71.
    9. Gholamreza Torkzadeh & Gurpreet Dhillon, 2002. "Measuring Factors that Influence the Success of Internet Commerce," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 187-204, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:24:y:1976:i:5:p:951-972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.