IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v22y1974i1p1-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Analysis and Medical Malpractice

Author

Listed:
  • Brian E. Forst

    (The Center for Naval Analyses, Arlington, Virginia)

Abstract

Normative decision theory has been applied to the problem of evaluating alternative diagnosis-treatment strategies. The courts rely on a different set of doctrines in performing the same sort of evaluation. This paper investigates the differences. It is suggested that the alleged “malpractice crisis” results largely from the application of a set of ambiguous and mutually inconsistent medico-legal principles such as “reasonable medical certainty,” “standards of good medical practice in the community,” and “proximate cause.” The expected utility criterion of decision analysis is proposed as an alternative to this melange, both for the purposes of establishing the existence of negligence and for determining the proper amount of compensation.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian E. Forst, 1974. "Decision Analysis and Medical Malpractice," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 1-12, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:22:y:1974:i:1:p:1-12
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.22.1.1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.22.1.1
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.22.1.1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael L. DeKay & David A. Asch, 1998. "Is the Defensive Use of Diagnostic Tests Good for Patients, or Bad?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 18(1), pages 19-28, January.
    2. Dennis J. Mazur, 1986. "Court Viewpoints and Medical Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 6(4), pages 224-230, December.
    3. David A. Asch & James P. Patton & John C. Hershey, 1990. "Knowing for the Sake of Knowing," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 10(1), pages 47-57, February.
    4. Harold Bursztajn & Robert M. Hamm & Thomas G. Gutheil & Archie Brodsky, 1984. "The Decision-Analytic Approach to Medical Malpractice Law," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 4(4), pages 401-414, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:22:y:1974:i:1:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.