IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v13y1965i1p1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Stochastic Properties of Large Battle Models

Author

Listed:
  • Franklin C. Brooks

    (Technical Operations, Inc., Burlington, Massachusetts)

Abstract

This paper considers stochastic models of large battles. Such battle models are said to be stochastically determined if the gross results—for example, the casualties to each side—show low variance in repeated plays in which only the random numbers are changed. Here, low variance means a standard deviation small compared to the initial number of weapons engaged. When stochastic determinism exists in a large battle model, only a few replications of the model are needed to get good estimates of the gross results. Stochastic determinism with respect to casualties is shown to be present when the correlations between losses of individual weapons are relatively small or few in number; that is, when the fate of a given weapon has strong influence on the fates of only a limited number of other weapons. Three stochastic models—the Lanchester Linear and Square Law models and a simple missile battle model—which can be studied analytically are shown to be stochastically determined. Features of battle models that would lead to violation of stochastic determinism are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Franklin C. Brooks, 1965. "The Stochastic Properties of Large Battle Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:13:y:1965:i:1:p:1-17
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.13.1.1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.13.1.1
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.13.1.1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. C. J. Ancker, 1995. "A proposed foundation for a theory of combat," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(3), pages 311-343, April.
    2. C. J. Ancker & A. V. Gafarian, 1987. "The validity of assumptions underlying current uses of Lanchester attrition rates," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(4), pages 505-533, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:13:y:1965:i:1:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.