IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v26y2024i5p1639-1655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physician Adoption of AI Assistant

Author

Listed:
  • Ting Hou

    (Department of Digital Economics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Meng Li

    (C.T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77004)

  • Yinliang (Ricky) Tan

    (China Europe International Business School, Shanghai 201203, China)

  • Huazhong Zhao

    (College of Business, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

Abstract

Problem definition : Artificial intelligence (AI) assistants—software agents that can perform tasks or services for individuals—are among the most promising AI applications. However, little is known about the adoption of AI assistants by service providers (i.e., physicians) in a real-world healthcare setting. In this paper, we investigate the impact of the AI smartness (i.e., whether the AI assistant is powered by machine learning intelligence) and the impact of AI transparency (i.e., whether physicians are informed of the AI assistant). Methodology/results : We collaborate with a leading healthcare platform to run a field experiment in which we compare physicians’ adoption behavior, that is, adoption rate and adoption timing, of smart and automated AI assistants under transparent and non-transparent conditions. We find that the smartness can increase the adoption rate and shorten the adoption timing, whereas the transparency can only shorten the adoption timing. Moreover, the impact of AI transparency on the adoption rate is contingent on the smartness level of the AI assistant: the transparency increases the adoption rate only when the AI assistant is not equipped with smart algorithms and fails to do so when the AI assistant is smart. Managerial implications : Our study can guide platforms in designing their AI strategies. Platforms should improve the smartness of AI assistants. If such an improvement is too costly, the platform should transparentize the AI assistant, especially when it is not smart.

Suggested Citation

  • Ting Hou & Meng Li & Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Huazhong Zhao, 2024. "Physician Adoption of AI Assistant," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1639-1655, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:26:y:2024:i:5:p:1639-1655
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2023.0093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0093
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2023.0093?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:26:y:2024:i:5:p:1639-1655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.