IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v26y2024i4p1306-1322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frontiers in Operations: Employees vs. Contractors: An Operational Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ilan Lobel

    (Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, New York 10012)

  • Sébastien Martin

    (Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208)

  • Haotian Song

    (School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

Problem definition : We consider a platform’s problem of how to staff its operations given the possibilities of hiring employees and setting up a contractor marketplace. We aim to understand the operational difference between these two work arrangement models. Methodology/results : We consider a model where demand is not only stochastic but also evolving over time, which we capture via a state of the world that determines the demand distribution. In the case of employees, the platform controls the number of employee hours it uses for serving demand, whereas in the case of contractors, it sets the wage paid to them per utilized hour. We show that although the employee problem is equivalent to a standard newsvendor, the contractor one corresponds to an unusual version of the newsvendor model where utilization is the control variable. Managerial implications : This distinction makes the contractor model more flexible, allowing us to prove that it performs significantly better, especially if the order of magnitude of demand is unknown. Meanwhile, hybrid solutions that combine both employees and contractors have complex optimal solutions and offer relatively limited benefits relative to a contractor marketplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilan Lobel & Sébastien Martin & Haotian Song, 2024. "Frontiers in Operations: Employees vs. Contractors: An Operational Perspective," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 1306-1322, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:26:y:2024:i:4:p:1306-1322
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2023.0029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0029
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2023.0029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:26:y:2024:i:4:p:1306-1322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.