IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v22y2020i3p615-632.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Production Campaign Planning Under Learning and Decay

Author

Listed:
  • Hossein Jahandideh

    (Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1481)

  • Kumar Rajaram

    (Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1481)

  • Kevin McCardle

    (Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1481)

Abstract

Problem definition : We analyze a catalyst-activated batch-production process with uncertainty in production times, learning about catalyst-productivity characteristics and decay of catalyst performance across batches. The goal is to determine the quality level of batches and to decide when to replenish a catalyst so as to minimize average costs, consisting of inventory-holding, backlogging, and catalyst-switching costs. Academic/practical relevance : This is an important problem in a variety of process-industry sectors, such as food processing, pharmaceuticals, and specialty chemicals, but has not been adequately studied in the academic literature. This paper also contributes to the stochastic economic lot-sizing literature. Methodology : We formulate this problem as a semi-Markov decision process (SMDP) and develop a two-level heuristic to solve this problem. The heuristic consists of a lower-level problem that plans the duration of batches within the current campaign to maximize the efficiency of the catalyst while ensuring that the target attribute level for each batch is set to meet a quality specification represented by an average attribute level across all the batches in a campaign. The higher-level problem determines when to replace the costly catalyst as its productivity decays. To evaluate our heuristic, we present a lower bound on the optimal value of the SMDP. This bound accounts for all costs, as well as the randomness and discreteness in the process. We then extend our methods to multiple-product settings, which results in an advanced stochastic economic lot-sizing problem. Results : We test our proposed solution methodology with data from a leading food-processing company and show that our methods outperform current practice with an average improvement of around 22% in costs. In addition, compared with the stochastic lower bounds, our results show that the two-level heuristic attains near-optimal performance for the intractable multidimensional SMDP. Managerial implications : Our results generate three important managerial insights. First, our simulation-based lower bound provides a close approximation to the optimal cost of the SMDP, and it is nearly attainable by using a relatively simple two-level heuristic. Second, the reoptimization policy used in the lower-level problem adequately captures the value of information and Bayesian learning. Third, in the higher-level problem of choosing when to replace a catalyst, the intractable multidimensional state of the system is efficiently summarized by a single statistic: the probability of inventory falling below a specific threshold.

Suggested Citation

  • Hossein Jahandideh & Kumar Rajaram & Kevin McCardle, 2020. "Production Campaign Planning Under Learning and Decay," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 615-632, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:22:y:2020:i:3:p:615-632
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2018.0766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2018.0766
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2018.0766?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Papachristos, S. & Konstantaras, I., 2006. "Economic ordering quantity models for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 148-154, March.
    2. Vaughan, Timothy S., 2007. "Cyclical schedules vs. dynamic sequencing: Replenishment dynamics and inventory efficiency," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 518-527, June.
    3. David B. Brown & James E. Smith, 2013. "Optimal Sequential Exploration: Bandits, Clairvoyants, and Wildcats," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 644-665, June.
    4. Nils Löhndorf & Stefan Minner, 2013. "Simulation optimization for the stochastic economic lot scheduling problem," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(7), pages 796-810.
    5. Kumar Rajaram & Zhili Tian, 2009. "Buffer location and sizing to optimize cost and quality in semi-continuous manufacturing processes: Methodology and application," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(12), pages 1035-1048.
    6. Leroy B. Schwarz, 2008. "The Economic Order-Quantity (EOQ) Model," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Dilip Chhajed & Timothy J. Lowe (ed.), Building Intuition, chapter 8, pages 135-154, Springer.
    7. Joseph B. Mazzola & Kevin F. McCardle, 1996. "A Bayesian Approach to Managing Learning-Curve Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(5), pages 680-692, May.
    8. Awi Federgruen & Ziv Katalan, 1996. "The Stochastic Economic Lot Scheduling Problem: Cyclical Base-Stock Policies with Idle Times," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 783-796, June.
    9. Kumar Rajaram & Uday S. Karmarkar, 2004. "Campaign Planning and Scheduling for Multiproduct Batch Operations with Applications to the Food-Processing Industry," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 253-269, October.
    10. Kumar Rajaram & Uday S. Karmarkar, 2002. "Product Cycling With Uncertain Yields: Analysis and Application to the Process Industry," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 680-691, August.
    11. Retsef Levi & Cong Shi, 2013. "Approximation Algorithms for the Stochastic Lot-Sizing Problem with Order Lead Times," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 593-602, June.
    12. Winands, E.M.M. & Adan, I.J.B.F. & van Houtum, G.J., 2011. "The stochastic economic lot scheduling problem: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 1-9, April.
    13. Dragos Florin Ciocan & Vivek Farias, 2012. "Model Predictive Control for Dynamic Resource Allocation," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 501-525, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei, Liqun & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2021. "Strategic substitutes or complements? The relationship between capacity sharing and postponement flexibility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 138-148.
    2. Menezes, Mozart B.C. & Jalali, Hamed & Lamas, Alejandro, 2021. "One too many: Product proliferation and the financial performance in manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mili Mehrotra & Milind Dawande & Srinagesh Gavirneni & Mehmet Demirci & Sridhar Tayur, 2011. "OR PRACTICE---Production Planning with Patterns: A Problem from Processed Food Manufacturing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 267-282, April.
    2. Briskorn, Dirk & Zeise, Philipp & Packowski, Josef, 2016. "Quasi-fixed cyclic production schemes for multiple products with stochastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 156-169.
    3. Alberto Vera & Siddhartha Banerjee, 2021. "The Bayesian Prophet: A Low-Regret Framework for Online Decision Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1368-1391, March.
    4. Dirk Briskorn & Philipp Zeise, 2019. "A cyclic production scheme for the synchronized and integrated two-level lot-sizing and scheduling problem with no-wait restrictions and stochastic demand," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(4), pages 895-942, December.
    5. Löhndorf, Nils & Riel, Manuel & Minner, Stefan, 2014. "Simulation optimization for the stochastic economic lot scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 170-176.
    6. Menezes, Mozart B.C. & Jalali, Hamed & Lamas, Alejandro, 2021. "One too many: Product proliferation and the financial performance in manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    7. Garn, Wolfgang & Aitken, James, 2015. "Agile factorial production for a single manufacturing line with multiple products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 754-766.
    8. Huanan Zhang & Cong Shi & Chao Qin & Cheng Hua, 2016. "Stochastic regret minimization for revenue management problems with nonstationary demands," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(6), pages 433-448, September.
    9. Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Vandaele, Nico & Rajaram, Kumar & Karmarkar, Uday S., 2007. "Buffer sizing in multi-product multi-reactor batch processes: Impact of allocation and campaign sizing policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 424-443, June.
    10. Ben Klemens, 2021. "Attributing Value to Patents and Trademarks in Complex Production Chains," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 842-875, June.
    11. Awi Federgruen & Zhe Liu & Lijian Lu, 2022. "Dual sourcing: Creating and utilizing flexible capacities with a second supply source," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2789-2805, July.
    12. Xiuli Chao & Xiting Gong & Cong Shi & Chaolin Yang & Huanan Zhang & Sean X. Zhou, 2018. "Approximation Algorithms for Capacitated Perishable Inventory Systems with Positive Lead Times," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 5038-5061, November.
    13. Tapan Kumar Datta, 2017. "Inventory system with defective products and investment opportunity for reducing defective proportion," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 297-312, April.
    14. Huanan Zhang & Cong Shi & Xiuli Chao, 2016. "Technical Note—Approximation Algorithms for Perishable Inventory Systems with Setup Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 432-440, April.
    15. Qing Li & Shaohui Zheng, 2006. "Joint Inventory Replenishment and Pricing Control for Systems with Uncertain Yield and Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 696-705, August.
    16. N. Bora Keskin & John R. Birge, 2019. "Dynamic Selling Mechanisms for Product Differentiation and Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(4), pages 1069-1089, July.
    17. Ivan Darma Wangsa & Hui Ming Wee & Shih-Hsien Tseng, 2019. "A coordinated vendor–buyer system considering loss and damage claims, insurance cost and stochastic lead time," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(3), pages 384-398, June.
    18. Stefanus Jasin & Amitabh Sinha, 2015. "An LP-Based Correlated Rounding Scheme for Multi-Item Ecommerce Order Fulfillment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1336-1351, December.
    19. Yanzhe (Murray) Lei & Stefanus Jasin & Amitabh Sinha, 2018. "Joint Dynamic Pricing and Order Fulfillment for E-commerce Retailers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 269-284, May.
    20. József Vörös, 2013. "Economic order and production quantity models without constraint on the percentage of defective items," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 21(4), pages 867-885, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:22:y:2020:i:3:p:615-632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.