IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormoor/v45y2020i3p862-888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power-of- d -Choices with Memory: Fluid Limit and Optimality

Author

Listed:
  • Jonatha Anselmi

    (Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, INRIA, Grenoble INP, LIG, 38000 Grenoble, France; INRIA Bordeaux Sud Ouest, Team: CQFD, 33000 Bordeaux, France)

  • Francois Dufour

    (Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux, INRIA Bordeaux Sud Ouest, Team: CQFD, IMB, Institut de Mathématiques de Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France)

Abstract

In multiserver distributed queueing systems, the access of stochastically arriving jobs to resources is often regulated by a dispatcher, also known as a load balancer. A fundamental problem consists in designing a load-balancing algorithm that minimizes the delays experienced by jobs. During the last two decades, the power-of- d -choice algorithm, based on the idea of dispatching each job to the least loaded server out of d servers randomly sampled at the arrival of the job itself, has emerged as a breakthrough in the foundations of this area because of its versatility and appealing asymptotic properties. In this paper, we consider the power-of- d -choice algorithm with the addition of a local memory that keeps track of the latest observations collected over time on the sampled servers. Then, each job is sent to a server with the lowest observation. We show that this algorithm is asymptotically optimal in the sense that the load balancer can always assign each job to an idle server in the large-system limit. This holds true if and only if the system load λ is less than 1 − 1 d . If this condition is not satisfied, we show that queue lengths are bounded by ⌈ − log ( 1 − λ ) log ( λd + 1 ) ⌉ . This is in contrast with the classic version of the power-of- d -choice algorithm, in which, at the fluid scale, a strictly positive proportion of servers containing i jobs exists for all i ≥ 0 in equilibrium. Our results quantify and highlight the importance of using memory as a means to enhance performance in randomized load balancing.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonatha Anselmi & Francois Dufour, 2020. "Power-of- d -Choices with Memory: Fluid Limit and Optimality," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 862-888, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:45:y:2020:i:3:p:862-888
    DOI: 10.1287/moor.2019.1014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2019.1014
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/moor.2019.1014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kristen Gardner & Mor Harchol-Balter & Alan Scheller-Wolf & Mark Velednitsky & Samuel Zbarsky, 2017. "Redundancy-d: The Power of d Choices for Redundancy," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1078-1094, August.
    2. Varun Gupta & Neil Walton, 2019. "Load Balancing in the Nondegenerate Slowdown Regime," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 281-294, January.
    3. Lei Ying & R. Srikant & Xiaohan Kang, 2017. "The Power of Slightly More than One Sample in Randomized Load Balancing," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 692-722, August.
    4. Hong Chen & Heng-Qing Ye, 2012. "Asymptotic Optimality of Balanced Routing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 163-179, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhong, Zhiheng & Cao, Ping, 2023. "Balanced routing with partial information in a distributed parallel many-server queueing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 618-633.
    2. Cao, Ping & Zhong, Zhiheng & Huang, Junfei, 2021. "Dynamic routing in a distributed parallel many-server service system: The effect of ξ-choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 219-235.
    3. Mor Harchol-Balter, 2021. "Open problems in queueing theory inspired by datacenter computing," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 3-37, February.
    4. Debankur Mukherjee, 2022. "Rates of convergence of the join the shortest queue policy for large-system heavy traffic," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 317-319, April.
    5. Kristen Gardner, 2022. "Correlation in redundancy systems," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 197-199, April.
    6. Youri Raaijmakers & Sem Borst & Onno Boxma, 2019. "Redundancy scheduling with scaled Bernoulli service requirements," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 67-82, October.
    7. Rami Atar & Isaac Keslassy & Gal Mendelson, 2019. "Replicate to the shortest queues," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Chihoon Lee & Amy R. Ward & Heng-Qing Ye, 2021. "Stationary distribution convergence of the offered waiting processes in heavy traffic under general patience time scaling," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 99(3), pages 283-303, December.
    9. Dinard van der Laan, 2015. "Assigning Multiple Job Types to Parallel Specialized Servers," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-102/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    10. Kristen Gardner & Rhonda Righter, 2022. "The cost of collaboration," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 7-40, February.
    11. Seva Shneer & Alexander L. Stolyar, 2021. "Large-scale parallel server system with multi-component jobs," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 21-48, June.
    12. Jazeem Abdul Jaleel & Sherwin Doroudi & Kristen Gardner & Alexander Wickeham, 2022. "A general “power-of-d” dispatching framework for heterogeneous systems," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 431-480, December.
    13. Cardinaels, Ellen & Borst, Sem & van Leeuwaarden, Johan S.H., 2022. "Heavy-traffic universality of redundancy systems with assignment constraints," Other publications TiSEM 1ab2791a-b085-466e-8ada-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Kristen Gardner & Rhonda Righter, 2020. "Product forms for FCFS queueing models with arbitrary server-job compatibilities: an overview," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 3-51, October.
    15. Daniela Hurtado-Lange & Siva Theja Maguluri, 2022. "A load balancing system in the many-server heavy-traffic asymptotics," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 101(3), pages 353-391, August.
    16. Sem Borst, 2022. "Load balancing in large-scale heterogeneous systems," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 397-399, April.
    17. Chihoon Lee & Amy R. Ward & Heng-Qing Ye, 2020. "Stationary distribution convergence of the offered waiting processes for $$GI/GI/1+GI$$GI/GI/1+GI queues in heavy traffic," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 147-173, February.
    18. Rami Atar & Isaac Keslassy & Gal Mendelson, 2019. "Subdiffusive Load Balancing in Time-Varying Queueing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1678-1698, November.
    19. Anton Braverman, 2020. "Steady-State Analysis of the Join-the-Shortest-Queue Model in the Halfin–Whitt Regime," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 1069-1103, August.
    20. Rami Atar & David Lipshutz, 2021. "Heavy Traffic Limits for Join-the-Shortest-Estimated-Queue Policy Using Delayed Information," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 268-300, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:45:y:2020:i:3:p:862-888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.