IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i3p2035-2055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital vs. Traditional Advertising and the Recognition of Brand Intangible Assets

Author

Listed:
  • Scarlett Xiaotong Song

    (Peter T. Paul College of Business and Economics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824)

Abstract

This paper examines how different advertising categories are associated with attributes of brand asset recognition arising in the context of acquisitions. Prior research documents that aggregate advertising is positively associated with firm sales and brand values, but it fails to consider major recent shifts in advertising from traditional channels (such as TV) to digital advertising (such as paid search and online display). Using proprietary data, I decompose advertising expenditures into the categories of traditional, online display, and paid search. Consistent with expectations, results confirm that target firms’ traditional and online display advertising exhibit a higher likelihood of brand asset recognition and higher recognized brand values as compared with paid search advertising. Confirming the economic substance of the recognized brands, additional results reveal positive investor equity market reactions to brand value, which are driven by firms investing more in traditional and online display advertising. Overall, these results confirm that certain advertising channels exhibit stronger associations with the recognition and characteristics of the underlying brand asset, consistent with their heterogeneous properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Scarlett Xiaotong Song, 2025. "Digital vs. Traditional Advertising and the Recognition of Brand Intangible Assets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(3), pages 2035-2055, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:3:p:2035-2055
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.00387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.00387
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2022.00387?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:3:p:2035-2055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.