IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i1p942-953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Random Friends Seed More Buzz and Adoption? Leveraging the Friendship Paradox

Author

Listed:
  • Vineet Kumar

    (Yale School of Management, New Haven, Connecticut 06511)

  • K. Sudhir

    (Yale School of Management, New Haven, Connecticut 06511)

Abstract

A critical element of word of mouth (WOM) or buzz marketing is to identify seeds, often central actors with high degree in the social network. Seed identification typically requires data on the relevant network structure, which is often unavailable. We examine the impact of WOM seeding strategies motivated by the friendship paradox, which can obtain more central nodes without knowing network structure . Higher degree nodes may be less effective as seeds if these nodes communicate less with neighbors or are less persuasive when they communicate; therefore, whether friendship paradox–motivated seeding strategies increase or reduce WOM and adoption remains an empirical question. We develop and estimate a model of WOM and adoption using data on microfinance adoption across village social networks in India. Counterfactuals show that the proposed strategies with limited seeds are about 13%–30% more effective in increasing adoption relative to random seeding. These strategies are also on average 5%–11% more effective than the firm’s leader seeding strategy. We also find these strategies are relatively more effective when we have fewer seeds.

Suggested Citation

  • Vineet Kumar & K. Sudhir, 2025. "Can Random Friends Seed More Buzz and Adoption? Leveraging the Friendship Paradox," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(1), pages 942-953, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:1:p:942-953
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2024.4991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.4991
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2024.4991?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:1:p:942-953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.