IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i1p753-778.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Impact of Reviews on Consumer Product Choices Under Negotiated Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Jisu Cao

    (Department of Information Systems, W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281)

  • Sha Yang

    (Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089)

Abstract

We study the impact of reviews on product choices when consumers can negotiate price. Although prior research has examined the impact of reviews in various contexts, none has considered a setting in which the purchase price is negotiated. We postulate that online reviews affect demand through consumer baseline product preference and consumer bargaining power. Leveraging a unique data set of consumer reviews of new car purchases, we developed and estimated a structural model to decompose and quantify the two mechanisms of how reviews affect demand: baseline preference mechanism versus bargaining power mechanism. Our counterfactual analysis suggests that the bargaining power mechanism is more important than the baseline preference mechanism in explaining how historical price and discount frequency information in reviews affect seller profits. Ignoring the impact of reviews on the negotiated price leads to a biased estimation of the effectiveness of reviews. We call into caution a popular selling practice of using discounts in exchange for positive reviews, as it can backfire when future consumers leverage this discount information to negotiate a lower price.

Suggested Citation

  • Jisu Cao & Sha Yang, 2025. "Understanding the Impact of Reviews on Consumer Product Choices Under Negotiated Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(1), pages 753-778, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:1:p:753-778
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.02658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.02658
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2020.02658?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:1:p:753-778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.