IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i1p59-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Financial Consequences of Online Review Aggregators: Evidence from Yelp Ratings and SBA Loans

Author

Listed:
  • Ruidi Huang

    (Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275)

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the financial and real consequences of online review aggregators. Exploiting a regression discontinuity design that overcomes the endogenous relationship between Yelp reviews and Small Business Administration loan outcomes, I show that higher coarse Yelp ratings lead to improved loan terms and performance. Specifically, a one-half-star increase in Yelp ratings corresponds to a 25-basis-point decrease in loan spread and 6% lower collateral requirements. The effects are more pronounced when banks have less borrower information. Higher Yelp ratings also contribute to increased consumer demand and the likelihood of future business openings. These findings indicate that online review aggregators influence both consumer choices and banks’ financing decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruidi Huang, 2025. "The Financial Consequences of Online Review Aggregators: Evidence from Yelp Ratings and SBA Loans," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(1), pages 59-82, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:1:p:59-82
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.03003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.03003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2020.03003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:1:p:59-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.