IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v70y2024i9p6139-6157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bandits atop Reinforcement Learning: Tackling Online Inventory Models with Cyclic Demands

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao-Yue Gong

    (Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)

  • David Simchi-Levi

    (Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

Abstract

Motivated by a long-standing gap between inventory theory and practice, we study online inventory models with unknown cyclic demand distributions. We design provably efficient reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms that leverage the structure of inventory problems to achieve optimal theoretical guarantees that surpass existing results. We apply the standard performance measure in online learning literature, regret , which is defined as the difference between the total expected cost of our policy and the total expected cost of the clairvoyant optimal policy that has full knowledge of the demand distributions a priori. This paper analyzes, in the presence of unknown cyclic demands, both the lost-sales model with zero lead time and the multiproduct backlogging model with positive lead times, fixed joint-ordering costs and order limits. For both models, we first introduce episodic models where inventory is discarded at the end of every cycle, and then build upon these results to analyze the nondiscarding models. Our RL policies HQL and FQL achieve O ˜ ( T ) regret for the episodic lost-sales model and the episodic multiproduct backlogging model, matching the regret lower bound that we prove in this paper. For the nondiscarding models, we construct a bandit learning algorithm on top that governs multiple copies of the previous RL algorithms, named Meta-HQL . Meta-HQL achieves O ˜ ( T ) regret for the nondiscarding lost-sales model with zero lead time, again matching the regret lower bound. For the nondiscarding multiproduct backlogging model, our policy Mimic-QL achieves O ˜ ( T 5 / 6 ) regret. Our policies remove the regret dependence on the cardinality of the state-action space for inventory problems, which is an improvement over existing RL algorithms. We conducted experiments with a real sales data set from Rossmann, one of the largest drugstore chains in Europe, and also with a synthetic data set. For both sets of experiments, our policy converges rapidly to the optimal policy and dramatically outperforms the best policy that models demand as independent and identically distributed instead of cyclic.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao-Yue Gong & David Simchi-Levi, 2024. "Bandits atop Reinforcement Learning: Tackling Online Inventory Models with Cyclic Demands," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(9), pages 6139-6157, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:9:p:6139-6157
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4947
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4947?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:9:p:6139-6157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.