IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v70y2024i9p5853-5870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Benefit of the Doubt: Patent Examination Under Strategic Obfuscation

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolás Figueroa

    (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile)

  • Jorge Lemus

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801)

Abstract

An applicant privately observes the value of an idea and files a patent application. After the examination, the patent examiner may not find conclusive evidence of the idea’s value. In this case, granting a patent can be the right decision or a mistake. Moreover, it can prompt obfuscation —effort to disrupt communication—by the applicant, reducing allocative efficiency. We show there is more obfuscation when examiners are more lenient, and we provide an empirical exercise supporting this conclusion. We also show that more examination resources do not prevent and may lead to more obfuscation. This result continues to hold when applicants can invest in knowledge to increase their chances of having good ideas. We also show that there is less obfuscation when good ideas are harder to find.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolás Figueroa & Jorge Lemus, 2024. "The Benefit of the Doubt: Patent Examination Under Strategic Obfuscation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(9), pages 5853-5870, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:9:p:5853-5870
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.00140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.00140
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2023.00140?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:9:p:5853-5870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.