IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v70y2024i8p5557-5585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditor Tenure and Misreporting: Evidence from a Dynamic Oligopoly Game

Author

Listed:
  • Edwige Cheynel

    (Olin Business School, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130)

  • Frank S. Zhou

    (Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

Abstract

We estimate an infinite-horizon dynamic oligopoly model of audit firm tenure and misstatements and evaluate a policy counterfactual involving mandatory audit firm rotation. Longer tenure lowers the cost of producing audits, increasing audit quality and reducing audit fees. Thus clients are less likely to misstate and more likely to keep the incumbent audit firm as tenure increases. By reducing the value of retaining audit firms, mandatory rotation leads to large increases in auditor switches, even before the term limit, implying increases in the switching costs borne by clients. Misstatement rates increase because audit firms endogenously lower audit quality and newly hired audit firms have lower quality. Overall, the model suggests caution when evaluating the costs and benefits of government oversight over the audit profession.

Suggested Citation

  • Edwige Cheynel & Frank S. Zhou, 2024. "Auditor Tenure and Misreporting: Evidence from a Dynamic Oligopoly Game," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(8), pages 5557-5585, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:8:p:5557-5585
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4944
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4944?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:8:p:5557-5585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.