IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v70y2024i8p5502-5516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Betting on Diversity—Occupational Segregation and Gender Stereotypes

Author

Listed:
  • Urs Fischbacher

    (Department of Economics, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany; Thurgau Institute of Economics, 8280 Kreuzlingen, Switzerland)

  • Dorothea Kübler

    (Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, 10785 Berlin, Germany; Faculty of Economics and Management, Technical University Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany; CESifo, 81679 Munich, Germany)

  • Robert Stüber

    (Center for Behavioral Institutional Design, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 129188, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

Gender segregation of occupations and entire industries is widespread. The segregation could be the result of perceived job-specific productivity differences between men and women. It could also result from the belief that homogeneous teams perform better or from in-group bias of male or female recruiters. We investigate these explanations in two samples: students and personnel managers. The subjects bet on the productivity of teams that are homogeneous with respect to gender at the outset and then either remain homogeneous or become diverse. The teams work on tasks that differ with respect to gender stereotypes. We obtain similar results in both samples. Women are picked more often for the stereotypically female task, and men are picked more often for the stereotypically male task. Subjects believe that gender-diverse teams perform better, especially in the task with complementarities, and they display an own-gender bias. Elicited expectations about the bets of others reveal that subjects expect the gender stereotypes of tasks but underestimate others’ bets on diversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Urs Fischbacher & Dorothea Kübler & Robert Stüber, 2024. "Betting on Diversity—Occupational Segregation and Gender Stereotypes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(8), pages 5502-5516, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:8:p:5502-5516
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4943
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4943?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:8:p:5502-5516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.