Author
Listed:
- Xiangshang Cai
(Management School, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZH, United Kingdom)
- Amedeo De Cesari
(The Accounting and Finance Group, Alliance Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester, Manchester M15 6PB, United Kingdom)
- Ning Gao
(The Accounting and Finance Group, Alliance Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester, Manchester M15 6PB, United Kingdom)
- Ni Peng
(School of Business and Management, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Acquisition announcements coincide with upward value revisions for the target firms’ technology peers, which are not due to economic relations based on product market, supply chain, or geographical location. Such a phenomenon is robust across subsample periods, not specific to merger or technology waves, and not related to product-market structure and the unique innovation features of certain technology-intensive industries. Firms experience more dramatic value revisions when they have deeper technology overlaps with their targets, are more dependent on technology, or when a transaction features higher premium or greater technology overlap between the acquirer and target. Our mechanism analysis provides evidence that is primarily consistent with the acquisition-probability hypothesis whereby acquisition announcements elevate expected technology synergies and merger prospects for peers and partially in line with the enhanced-investment hypothesis that peers’ revaluations correlate with increased technology investments. We do not find any evidence in line with the competition-balance hypothesis that attributes peers’ value revisions to the change in industrial competition intensity. Overall, our results demonstrate that acquisition announcements disseminate novel information about the value of technology that is of common interest among firms with close technologies.
Suggested Citation
Xiangshang Cai & Amedeo De Cesari & Ning Gao & Ni Peng, 2024.
"Acquisitions and Technology Value Revision,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(7), pages 4283-4305, July.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:7:p:4283-4305
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4890
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:7:p:4283-4305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.