IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v70y2024i6p3510-3526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Decision Making for Others Close the Gender Gap in Competition?

Author

Listed:
  • John Ifcher

    (Department of Economics, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California 95053)

  • Homa Zarghamee

    (Department of Economics, Barnard College, New York, New York 10027)

Abstract

We examine whether the gender gap in competitiveness in stereotypically male tasks persists when the decision to compete is made by someone else. In a within-subject laboratory experiment, decision makers make competition entry decisions for both themselves and a randomly selected other. Although we replicate the standard gender gap in decisions for oneself, we do not find a gender gap when the decision to compete is made by someone else. This is driven by men being significantly more willing to enter themselves than others into competitions. Men’s and women’s willingness to enter others into competitions is statistically indistinguishable from women’s willingness to enter themselves into competitions. Subgroup analyses reveal that competitive preferences are significantly greater for Asian than non-Asian subjects. Our results have implications for the effectiveness of nominations and mentorship to close gender gaps in labor market outcomes that are affected by competitive preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • John Ifcher & Homa Zarghamee, 2024. "Does Decision Making for Others Close the Gender Gap in Competition?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(6), pages 3510-3526, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:6:p:3510-3526
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4861
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4861?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:6:p:3510-3526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.