Author
Listed:
- David B. Brown
(Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708)
- Cagin Uru
(Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708)
Abstract
We study a variation of the classical Pandora’s problem in which a decision maker (DM) sequentially explores alternatives from a given set and learns their values while trying to acquire the best alternative. The variations in the model we study are (i) alternatives randomly become unavailable during exploration and (ii) the DM’s ability to acquire a remaining alternative is uncertain and depends on a chosen offer price. Such acquisition uncertainties arise in many applications, including housing search, hiring problems, and e-commerce, but greatly complicate the search problem in that optimal policies retain all previously explored alternative values as part of the problem state, as opposed to only the highest explored value as in Pandora’s rule. Our central insight is that despite the complexity that these acquisition uncertainties create, simple greedy policies based on static sequencing and a single threshold value enjoy strong performance guarantees. We develop such a class of policies and show how to compute them using a greedy algorithm whose worst-case run-time scales linearly (up to logarithmic factors) in the number of alternative types. We show that our policies (a) are asymptotically optimal in high multiplicity regimes with many alternatives and (b) obtain at least 1 − e − 1 ≈ 63.2 % of the optimal value under a broad set of conditions. Extensive numerical examples support this theory: We illustrate our policies on a variation of Pandora’s problem with disappearing alternatives and housing search on models calibrated on data from the online brokerage Redfin. In these examples, our policies significantly outperform policies based on Pandora’s rule.
Suggested Citation
David B. Brown & Cagin Uru, 2024.
"Sequential Search with Acquisition Uncertainty,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(11), pages 7712-7729, November.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:11:p:7712-7729
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.00203
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:11:p:7712-7729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.