IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v69y2023i1p342-350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privacy Regulation and Barriers to Public Health

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph R. Buckman

    (J. Mack Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303)

  • Idris Adjerid

    (Pamplin College of Business, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061)

  • Catherine Tucker

    (Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has killed millions and gravely disrupted the world’s economy. A safe and effective vaccine was developed remarkably swiftly, but as of yet, uptake of the vaccine has been slow. This paper explores one potential explanation of delayed adoption of the vaccine, which is data privacy concerns. We explore two contrasting regulations that vary across U.S. states that have the potential to affect the perceived privacy risk associated with receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. The first regulation—an “identification requirement”—increases privacy concerns by requiring individuals to verify residency with government approved documentation. The second regulation—“anonymity protection”—reduces privacy concerns by allowing individuals to remove personally identifying information from state-operated immunization registry systems. We investigate the effects of these privacy-reducing and privacy-protecting regulations on U.S. state-level COVID-19 vaccination rates. Using a panel data set, we find that identification requirements decrease vaccine demand but that this negative effect is offset when individuals are able to remove information from an immunization registry. Our results remain consistent when controlling for CDC-defined barriers to vaccination, levels of misinformation, vaccine incentives, and states’ phased distribution of vaccine supply. These findings yield significant theoretical and practical contributions for privacy policy and public health.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph R. Buckman & Idris Adjerid & Catherine Tucker, 2023. "Privacy Regulation and Barriers to Public Health," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 342-350, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:69:y:2023:i:1:p:342-350
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.4580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4580
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4580?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avi Goldfarb & Catherine Tucker, 2012. "Privacy and Innovation," NBER Chapters, in: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 12, pages 65-89, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Avi Goldfarb & Catherine E. Tucker, 2011. "Privacy Regulation and Online Advertising," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 57-71, January.
    3. Foldy, S. & Grannis, S. & Ross, D. & Smith, T., 2014. "A ride in the time machine: Information management capabilities health departments will need," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(9), pages 1592-1600.
    4. Amalia R. Miller & Catherine Tucker, 2009. "Privacy Protection and Technology Diffusion: The Case of Electronic Medical Records," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(7), pages 1077-1093, July.
    5. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303947_9 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Rose, D.A. & Murthy, S. & Brooks, J. & Bryant, J., 2017. "The Evolution of Public Health Emergency Management as a Field of Practice," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(S2), pages 126-133.
    7. Amalia R. Miller & Catherine Tucker, 2018. "Privacy Protection, Personalized Medicine, and Genetic Testing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(10), pages 4648-4668, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Escamilla, Rafael & Brosi, Prisca & Fransoo, Jan C. & Mora-Quiñones, Camilo & Mejia Argueta, Christopher, 2024. "Tax privacy concerns hamper digitization of the nanostore channel," Other publications TiSEM 8ead01df-f8bf-421a-911d-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bleier, Alexander & Goldfarb, Avi & Tucker, Catherine, 2020. "Consumer privacy and the future of data-based innovation and marketing," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 466-480.
    2. Amalia R. Miller & Catherine Tucker, 2017. "Frontiers of Health Policy: Digital Data and Personalized Medicine," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 17(1), pages 49-75.
    3. Yassine Lefouili & Leonardo Madio & Ying Lei Toh, 2024. "Privacy Regulation and Quality‐Enhancing Innovation," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 662-684, June.
    4. Yassine Lefouili & Leonardo Madio & Ying Lei Toh, 2024. "Privacy regulation and quality-enhancing innovation," Post-Print hal-04774302, HAL.
    5. Jian Jia & Ginger Zhe Jin & Liad Wagman, 2018. "The Short-Run Effects of GDPR on Technology Venture Investment," NBER Working Papers 25248, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Jian Jia & Ginger Zhe Jin & Liad Wagman, 2021. "The Short-Run Effects of the General Data Protection Regulation on Technology Venture Investment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 661-684, July.
    7. Miguel Godinho de Matos & Idris Adjerid, 2022. "Consumer Consent and Firm Targeting After GDPR: The Case of a Large Telecom Provider," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(5), pages 3330-3378, May.
    8. Marthews, Alex & Tucker, Catherine, 2023. "What blockchain can and can’t do: Applications to marketing and privacy," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 49-53.
    9. Catherine E. Tucker, 2023. "The Economics of Privacy: An Agenda," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Privacy, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Jin-Hyuk Kim & Liad Wagman, 2015. "Screening incentives and privacy protection in financial markets: a theoretical and empirical analysis," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 46(1), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Avi Goldfarb, 2014. "What is Different About Online Advertising?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 44(2), pages 115-129, March.
    12. Ravi Bapna & Jui Ramaprasad & Galit Shmueli & Akhmed Umyarov, 2016. "One-Way Mirrors in Online Dating: A Randomized Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(11), pages 3100-3122, November.
    13. Lesley Chiou & Catherine Tucker, 2017. "Search Engines and Data Retention: Implications for Privacy and Antitrust," NBER Working Papers 23815, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Idris Adjerid & Alessandro Acquisti & Rahul Telang & Rema Padman & Julia Adler-Milstein, 2016. "The Impact of Privacy Regulation and Technology Incentives: The Case of Health Information Exchanges," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 1042-1063, April.
    15. Carl Benedikt Frey & Giorgio Presidente, 2024. "Privacy regulation and firm performance: Estimating the GDPR effect globally," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 62(3), pages 1074-1089, July.
    16. Escamilla, Rafael & Brosi, Prisca & Fransoo, Jan C. & Mora-Quiñones, Camilo & Mejia Argueta, Christopher, 2024. "Tax privacy concerns hamper digitization of the nanostore channel," Other publications TiSEM 8ead01df-f8bf-421a-911d-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Zhuo, Ran & Huffaker, Bradley & claffy, kc & Greenstein, Shane, 2021. "The impact of the General Data Protection Regulation on internet interconnection," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2).
    18. Jin, Ginger Zhe & Wagman, Liad, 2021. "Big data at the crossroads of antitrust and consumer protection," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    19. Avi Goldfarb & Catherine Tucker, 2012. "Privacy and Innovation," NBER Chapters, in: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 12, pages 65-89, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Michael Kummer & Patrick Schulte, 2019. "When Private Information Settles the Bill: Money and Privacy in Google’s Market for Smartphone Applications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(8), pages 3470-3494, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:69:y:2023:i:1:p:342-350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.