IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v43y1997i10p1431-1436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revised-Modified Penalties for Fixed Charge Transportation Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce W. Lamar

    (MITRE Corporation, Bedford, Massachusetts 01730)

  • Chris A. Wallace

    (University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand)

Abstract

Conditional penalties are used to obtain lower bounds to subproblems in a branch-and-bound procedure that can be tighter than the LP relaxation of the subproblems. For the fixed charge transportation problem (FCTP), branch-and-bound algorithms have been implemented using conditional penalties proposed by Driebeek (Driebeek, N. 1966. An algorithm for the solution of mixed integer programming problems. Management Sci. 12 576--587.), Cabot and Erenguc (Cabot, A. V., S. S. Erenguc. 1984. Some branch-and-bound procedures for fixed-cost transportation problems. Naval Res. Logistics 31 145--154.), and Palekar et al. (Palekar, V. S., M. H. Karwan, S. Zionts. 1990. A branch-and-bound method for the fixed charge transportation problem. Management Sci. 36 1092--1105.). The last conditional penalties are referred to as the "modified" penalties. In this paper, we show that the modified penalties are not valid conditional penalties. In fact, in nearly a quarter of the test problems examined, the modified penalties prevented the branch-and-bound algorithm from properly identifying the optimal solution to the FCTP. A simple change, which corrects a subcase in the penalty calculation, restores the validity of the modified penalties while retaining their efficiency. Computational tests indicate that the "revised-modified" penalties continue to dominate the Driebeek and the Cabot and Erenguc penalties.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce W. Lamar & Chris A. Wallace, 1997. "Revised-Modified Penalties for Fixed Charge Transportation Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(10), pages 1431-1436, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:43:y:1997:i:10:p:1431-1436
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.43.10.1431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.10.1431
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.43.10.1431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francesca Maggioni & Michal Kaut & Luca Bertazzi, 2009. "Stochastic optimization models for a single-sink transportation problem," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 251-267, May.
    2. Gavin J. Bell & Bruce W. Lamar & Chris A. Wallace, 1999. "Capacity improvement, penalties, and the fixed charge transportation problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(4), pages 341-355, June.
    3. Erika Buson & Roberto Roberti & Paolo Toth, 2014. "A Reduced-Cost Iterated Local Search Heuristic for the Fixed-Charge Transportation Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1095-1106, October.
    4. Jawahar, N. & Balaji, A.N., 2009. "A genetic algorithm for the two-stage supply chain distribution problem associated with a fixed charge," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(2), pages 496-537, April.
    5. Roberto Roberti & Enrico Bartolini & Aristide Mingozzi, 2015. "The Fixed Charge Transportation Problem: An Exact Algorithm Based on a New Integer Programming Formulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(6), pages 1275-1291, June.
    6. Sun, Minghe, 2002. "The transportation problem with exclusionary side constraints and two branch-and-bound algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(3), pages 629-647, August.
    7. Jesús Sáez Aguado, 2009. "Fixed Charge Transportation Problems: a new heuristic approach based on Lagrangean relaxation and the solving of core problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 45-69, November.
    8. Yogesh Agarwal & Yash Aneja, 2012. "Fixed-Charge Transportation Problem: Facets of the Projection Polyhedron," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 638-654, June.
    9. Jeffery L. Kennington & Charles D. Nicholson, 2010. "The Uncapacitated Time-Space Fixed-Charge Network Flow Problem: An Empirical Investigation of Procedures for Arc Capacity Assignment," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 326-337, May.
    10. Dimitri J. Papageorgiou & Alejandro Toriello & George L. Nemhauser & Martin W. P. Savelsbergh, 2012. "Fixed-Charge Transportation with Product Blending," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 281-295, May.
    11. Francesca Maggioni & Florian A. Potra & Marida Bertocchi, 2017. "A scenario-based framework for supply planning under uncertainty: stochastic programming versus robust optimization approaches," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 5-44, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:43:y:1997:i:10:p:1431-1436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.