IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v38y1992i4p514-524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

R&D Cooperation Between Firms---A Perceived Transaction Cost Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Klaus Brockhoff

    (Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany)

Abstract

Transaction cost is considered as an explanatory variable for the choice between markets and various organizational arrangements for performing some predefined tasks, such as engaging in private R&D. With respect to R&D cooperation between firms, we show that the perception of high transaction cost is related to certain characteristics of the firm and to the type of R&D task. We also show a relationship between the perception of transaction cost and the perceived success of the cooperation. The analysis sheds light on various determinants of transaction costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Klaus Brockhoff, 1992. "R&D Cooperation Between Firms---A Perceived Transaction Cost Perspective," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 514-524, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:38:y:1992:i:4:p:514-524
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.38.4.514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.38.4.514
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.38.4.514?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fritsch, Michael & Lukas, Rolf, 2001. "Who cooperates on R&D?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 297-312, February.
    2. Markus Solf, 2004. "Unternehmenskooperationen als Folge von Informations- und Kommunikations-technologieveränderungen: Eine theoretische Analyse," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 146-167, March.
    3. repec:cte:wbrepe:wb050101 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Christoph Grimpe & Ulrich Kaiser, 2008. "Gains and Pains from Contract Research: A Transaction and Firm-level Perspective," CIE Discussion Papers 2008-01, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Industrial Economics.
    5. Weimin Ma & Ranran Zhang & Shiwei Chai, 2019. "What Drives Green Innovation? A Game Theoretic Analysis of Government Subsidy and Cooperation Contract," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Gaetano Martino & Paolo Polinori, 2011. "Productive process innovation as sequential adjustment of the hybrid governance structure: the case of the poultry sector," Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia, Finanza e Statistica 88/2011, Università di Perugia, Dipartimento Economia.
    7. Ki H. Kang & Jina Kang, 2009. "How Do Firms Source External Knowledge for Innovation? Analyzing Effects of Different Knowledge Sourcing Methods," TEMEP Discussion Papers 200907, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Aug 2009.
    8. Loch, Adam & Wheeler, Sarah Ann & Settre, Claire, 2018. "Private Transaction Costs of Water Trade in the Murray–Darling Basin," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 560-573.
    9. Müller, Christian & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2004. "Einflussfaktoren auf die Effizienz von FuE-Kooperationen in der Biotechnologie-Branche: Eine kausalanalytische Untersuchung," Working Papers 20, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    10. Müller, Dirk, 2010. "Alliance Coordination, Dysfunctions, and the Protection of Idiosyncratic Knowledge in Strategic Learning Alliances," EconStor Preprints 41039, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    11. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5009 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Müller, Christian & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2003. "Einflußfaktoren auf das Management von Forschungs- und Entwicklungskooperationen: Eine empirische Analyse in der Biotechnologie," Working Papers 19, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    13. Giacomarra, Marcella & Shams, S.M. Riad & Crescimanno, Maria & Sakka, Georgia & Gregori, Gian Luca & Galati, Antonino, 2021. "Internal vs. external R&D teams: Evidences from the Italian wine industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 752-761.
    14. Shu-Hao Chang, 2017. "The evolutionary growth estimation model of international cooperative patent networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(2), pages 711-729, August.
    15. Li-Ying, Jason & Mothe, Caroline & Nguyen, Thi Thuc Uyen, 2018. "Linking forms of inbound open innovation to a driver-based typology of environmental innovation: Evidence from French manufacturing firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 51-63.
    16. Jason Li-Ying & Caroline Mothe & Uyen Nguyen-Thi, 2018. "Linking forms of inbound open innovation to a driver-based typology of environmental innovation: Evidence from French manufacturing firms," Post-Print hal-01695525, HAL.
    17. Ki H. Kang & Jina Kang, 2009. "Do External Knowledge Sourcing Methods Matter in Service Innovation? Analysis of South Korean Service Firms," TEMEP Discussion Papers 200908, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Aug 2009.
    18. Landon Kleis & Paul Chwelos & Ronald V. Ramirez & Iain Cockburn, 2012. "Information Technology and Intangible Output: The Impact of IT Investment on Innovation Productivity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 42-59, March.
    19. Haji Ali Beigi, Maryam, 2021. "Is more diverse always the better? External knowledge source clusters and innovation performance in Germany," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 156, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    20. Subramanian, Annapoornima M. & Lim, Kwanghui & Soh, Pek-Hooi, 2013. "When birds of a feather don’t flock together: Different scientists and the roles they play in biotech R&D alliances," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 595-612.
    21. Mettepenningen, E. & Beckmann, V. & Eggers, J., 2011. "Public transaction costs of agri-environmental schemes and their determinants--Analysing stakeholders' involvement and perceptions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 641-650, February.
    22. Ramsza Michał & Karbowski Adam, 2020. "Product R&D Coopetition and Firm Performance," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 1-9, June.
    23. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6963 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. Voigt, Tim & Kuhl, Rainer, 2008. "Competencies of Reconfiguration in Product Development – The Case of Convenience Food," 110th Seminar, February 18-22, 2008, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 49880, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:38:y:1992:i:4:p:514-524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.