IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v34y1988i5p619-632.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long Range Process Design and Compatibility Among Operations

Author

Listed:
  • Jaya Singhal

    (Department of Information and Quantitative Sciences, University of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland 21201)

  • Kalyan Singhal

    (Department of Management, University of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland 21201)

  • James K. Weeks

    (School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, North Carolina 27412)

Abstract

Most processes consist of several operations. Some or all of these operations may have more than one alternative technological method, resulting in an exponential relationship between the number of possible designs and the number of operation alternatives. However, some of these designs may not be feasible because of incompatibilities among operation alternatives. A feasible process design will include one alternative for each operation in such a way that each operation is compatible with every other operation in the design. For identifying these feasible designs, there are two approaches: traditional and morphological. The former relies on trial-and-error, expert judgment, and creative thinking and the latter considers, explicitly or implicitly, every possible design. This paper presents an efficient algorithm with computational results for identifying all feasible designs based on compatibility considerations. The implementation issues, both computational and organizational, are discussed as integral parts of a framework for process design efforts. This framework combines the advantages of both the traditional and morphological approaches and mitigates their disadvantages. It also facilitates interaction between the expert's judgment and the programmed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaya Singhal & Kalyan Singhal & James K. Weeks, 1988. "Long Range Process Design and Compatibility Among Operations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 619-632, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:34:y:1988:i:5:p:619-632
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.34.5.619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.34.5.619
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.34.5.619?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:34:y:1988:i:5:p:619-632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.