IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v34y1988i4p431-445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Splitting Attributes on Weights in Multiattribute Utility Measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Weber

    (Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Lehr- und Forschungsgebiet Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Templergraben 64, 5100 Aachen, Federal Republic of Germany)

  • Franz Eisenführ

    (Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Lehr- und Forschungsgebiet Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Templergraben 64, 5100 Aachen, Federal Republic of Germany)

  • Detlof von Winterfeldt

    (Systems Science Department, Institute of Safety and Systems Management, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0021)

Abstract

This study examined how weights in multiattribute utility measurement change when objectives are split into more detailed levels. Subjects were asked to weight attributes in value trees containing three objectives which were specified by either three, four, five, or six attributes. The robust finding was that the more detailed parts of the value tree were weighted significantly higher than the less detailed ones. This overweighting bias was found for several weighting techniques, but the techniques that used holistic judgments to derive weights were affected somewhat less than techniques that used decomposed attribute weights. This bias is interpreted in terms of the increased salience and availability of attributes that are spelled out in more detail.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Weber & Franz Eisenführ & Detlof von Winterfeldt, 1988. "The Effects of Splitting Attributes on Weights in Multiattribute Utility Measurement," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 431-445, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:34:y:1988:i:4:p:431-445
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.34.4.431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.34.4.431
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.34.4.431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:34:y:1988:i:4:p:431-445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.