IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v31y1985i8p940-958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investment Planning and Arm's Length Control in a Nationalised Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Spyros K. Lioukas

    (Athens School of Economics and Business Science, 76 Patission Street, Athens 104, Greece)

Abstract

Applying a relatively decentralised system of control which would keep state-owned enterprises (SOE) at arm's length from ministerial departments has been a stated policy for many governments around the world. However, the specific controls typically used for implementing this policy have seldom been successful. The purpose of this paper is to review and evaluate certain of these controls, drawing upon the British system of arm's length control of nationalised industries. In order to delimit the problem the paper cuts across the government-SOE relationship from the perspective of investment planning. Using primary information from the capital investment process in a particular nationalised industry, the paper searches for evidence on whether and in what ways existing controls have not been successful. Three types of controls are investigated: (1) The economic and financial groundrules, which are supposed to simulate a competitive, business-style efficiency. These rules are often assumed to act as an "invisible hand," limiting direct government control. (2) The direct investment review, in the framework of the wider public sector expenditure survey. In discussing the nature of this review the paper examines whether government approval of investment conforms to an incrementalist or "muddling through" model. It further considers the role for incremental methods in controlling SOE investment. (3) The attempt to use corporate planning as a control instrument. Evidence from internal control processes within the enterprise and in particular the review of investment by a Central Executive is used in order to evaluate the above controls. This serves to show the diffuse character of the planning process and the possibilities and limitations of using similar controls at the government level. Suggestions are put forward for strengthening these forms of control by modifying or reinforcing certain elements within the existing arm's length framework. The paper would be useful for evaulating the difficulties involved in establishing some form of orderlines and formalisation in government-SOE relationships. It shows some of the weaknesses associated with certain "technocratic" rules and solutions to public policy problems in this environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Spyros K. Lioukas, 1985. "Investment Planning and Arm's Length Control in a Nationalised Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(8), pages 940-958, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:31:y:1985:i:8:p:940-958
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.31.8.940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.8.940
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.31.8.940?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John W. Boudreau, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: Organizational Behavior, Strategy, Performance, and Design in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1463-1476, November.
    2. Manto LAMPROPOULOU, 2018. "State‐Owned Enterprises In Greece: The Evolution Of A Paradigm 1996–2016," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(3), pages 491-526, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:31:y:1985:i:8:p:940-958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.