IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v27y1981i7p769-784.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Resource Allocation and Evaluation Model for Providing Services to the Mentally Retarded

Author

Listed:
  • Karl Heiner

    (Rensselear Polytechnic Institute)

  • William A. Wallace

    (Rensselear Polytechnic Institute)

  • Kevin Young

    (Harvard University)

Abstract

Legal decisions in the mental health field, and the process of deinstitutionalization have brought about an increasingly complex system of service delivery for the mentally retarded. We present a linear programming model to assist in managing such delivery systems. The usefulness and applicability of the model has been tested in Minnesota. We discuss how the procedure can be applied elsewhere. The model uses available measures of program efficiency and effectiveness, and transforms them into a form meaningful to the administrator who must make budgeting decisions and evaluate programs. In addition, with the help of this model, the administrator can incorporate important equity considerations into the management process.

Suggested Citation

  • Karl Heiner & William A. Wallace & Kevin Young, 1981. "A Resource Allocation and Evaluation Model for Providing Services to the Mentally Retarded," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(7), pages 769-784, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:27:y:1981:i:7:p:769-784
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.27.7.769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.27.7.769
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.27.7.769?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antreas D. Athanassopoulos, 1998. "Decision Support for Target-Based Resource Allocation of Public Services in Multiunit and Multilevel Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 173-187, February.
    2. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Mandakovic, Tomislav & Gupta, Sushil K. & Sahay, Sundeep & Hong, Sungwan, 1995. "A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 59-79, March.
    3. Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2003. "Decision Support for Allocating Scarce Drugs," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 1-11, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:27:y:1981:i:7:p:769-784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.