IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v22y1976i11p1186-1194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heuristics for Scheduling Resource-Constrained Projects: An Experimental Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Dale F. Cooper

    (Royal Holloway College (University of London))

Abstract

This paper considers the project scheduling problem with multiple constrained resources. Two classes of heuristic procedure, both making use of priority rules, are discussed: the parallel method, which generates just one schedule; and the sampling method, which generates a set of schedules using probabilistic techniques and selects the best schedule from this sample. An experimental investigation is described in which a set of projects with different characteristics is scheduled by each of these heuristics with a variety of priority rules. The effects of the heuristic method, the project characteristics and the priority rules are assessed. It is shown that the choice of priority rule is important with the parallel method, but with the sampling method, although it does affect the distribution of the sample, the choice of rule is not significant. The sampling method with sample size 100 is shown to produce samples at least 7% better than those generated by the corresponding parallel method, with 99% confidence. Further results are discussed and conclusions are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Dale F. Cooper, 1976. "Heuristics for Scheduling Resource-Constrained Projects: An Experimental Investigation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(11), pages 1186-1194, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:22:y:1976:i:11:p:1186-1194
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.22.11.1186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.22.11.1186
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.22.11.1186?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:22:y:1976:i:11:p:1186-1194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.