IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v16y1970i7p514-517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addendum to Stankard and Gupta's Note on Lot Size Scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Thom J. Hodgson

    (Industrial Engineering Department, The University of Michigan)

Abstract

This paper presents a grouping procedure which yields improved solutions to Bomberger's Lot Size Scheduling Problem [1]. The group definition is a generalization of the group definition proposed by Stankard and Gupta [3]. Moreover, the generalization leads to a pseudo dynamic programming procedure which is readily programmable. Computational experience has shown the procedure to be extremely efficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Thom J. Hodgson, 1970. "Addendum to Stankard and Gupta's Note on Lot Size Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(7), pages 514-517, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:16:y:1970:i:7:p:514-517
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.16.7.514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.16.7.514
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.16.7.514?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. P. C. Geng & R. G. Vickson, 1988. "Two heuristics for the economic lot scheduling problem: An experimental study," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(4), pages 605-617, August.
    2. Serge M. Karalli & A. Dale Flowers, 2006. "The Multiple-Family ELSP with Safety Stocks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 523-531, June.
    3. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo & Mohammadi, Babak, 2014. "A deterministic multi product single machine EPQ model with backordering, scraped products, rework and interruption in manufacturing process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 9-27.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:16:y:1970:i:7:p:514-517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.