IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v10y1991i3p205-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive Geometry: An Analysis of Structure Underlying Representations of Similarity

Author

Listed:
  • Rashi Glazer

    (University of California, Berkeley)

  • Kent Nakamoto

    (University of Arizona)

Abstract

This paper discusses the formal analysis of the underlying distance-based representations of consumer similarity judgments. Four models common in the marketing and psychological literature are examined—Euclidean and city-block spaces and ultrametric and additive trees. The analysis uses the distinction between “algebraic” and “geometric” structures as the basis for a unifying framework within which the four representations are compared and contrasted. The framework is then used to understand (1) the conditions under which model structure is theoretically revealing of the cognitive structure behind consumer behavior and (2) the degree to which similarity judgments and the resultant distance patterns are diagnostic of the appropriateness of a particular model. An important implication of the analysis is that there is a basic measurement indeterminacy associated with distance patterns, so that similarity data may not always reveal which is the “true” model in a given application. The consequences arising from this indeterminacy for the problem of model selection in marketing are illustrated with an empirical experiment designed to test the implications of the formal analysis in practical settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Rashi Glazer & Kent Nakamoto, 1991. "Cognitive Geometry: An Analysis of Structure Underlying Representations of Similarity," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 205-228.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:10:y:1991:i:3:p:205-228
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.10.3.205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.10.3.205
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.10.3.205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Phipps Arabie, 1991. "Was euclid an unnecessarily sophisticated psychologist?," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 567-587, December.
    2. Wedel, M. & Bijmolt, T.H.A., 1998. "Mixed Tree and Spatial Representation of Dissimilarity Judgments," Other publications TiSEM d586f79c-64b9-4c25-860a-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Buschena, David & Zilberman, David, 1992. "Not Just Another Paper Showing Violations of the Expected Utility Model: The Effects of Alternative Similarity on Risky Choice," CUDARE Working Papers 198603, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    4. Wedel, M. & Bijmolt, T.H.A., 1998. "Mixed Tree and Spatial Representation of Dissimilarity Judgments," Discussion Paper 1998-109, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:10:y:1991:i:3:p:205-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.