Author
Listed:
- Destenie Nock
(Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)
- Laura Pottmeyer
(Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence and Educational Innovation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)
- Alexana Cranmer
(Department of Natural and Applied Sciences, Bentley College, University Waltham, Waltham, Massachusetts 02452)
Abstract
Multiple studies call for engineering education to integrate social justice into classroom instruction. Yet, there is uncertainty regarding whether integrating these social topics into engineering curriculum will support or detract from the learning of technical concepts. This study focuses on evaluating how reframing technical assessments to include social justice concepts impacts student learning and investigates how well students integrate social justice into engineering decision making. Using a within-subject design, in which students were exposed to both conditions (questions with and without social justice context), we evaluate how social justice framing impacts overall student learning of technical topics. Social justice prompts are added to homework questions, and we assess students’ demonstration of knowledge of original technical content of the course, as well as their ability to consider social justice implications of engineering design. In the earlier homework assignment, the experimental group showed a significant decrease in learning when technical concepts were framed to include social justice. As the students became more familiar with social justice considerations, their learning of technical concepts became comparable to that of students who did not have the social justice components in their assignment. Their evaluation of the social implications of technical decisions also improved.
Suggested Citation
Destenie Nock & Laura Pottmeyer & Alexana Cranmer, 2025.
"Investigating How Social Justice Framing for Assessments Impacts Technical Learning,"
INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 136-151, January.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:orited:v:25:y:2025:i:2:p:136-151
DOI: 10.1287/ited.2022.0030
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:25:y:2025:i:2:p:136-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.