IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orited/v21y2021i2p67-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dark Side of Narrow Gamification: Negative Impact of Assessment Gamification on Student Perceptions and Content Knowledge

Author

Listed:
  • Hee Yoon Kwon

    (Tommy and Victoria Baker School of Business, The Citadel, Charleston, South Carolina 29409;)

  • Koray Özpolat

    (College of Business, The University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island 02881)

Abstract

We explored the effects of assessment gamification on students’ content knowledge and perceptions of satisfaction, course experience, learning, and impact of teaching techniques. The course preparation, attendance, quizzes, classroom activities, and team projects of an undergraduate operations and supply chain management course had game elements that accumulate to team advantages in the collaborative midterm and final exam. Interestingly, we found that gamifying assessment activities resulted in significantly lower content knowledge, satisfaction, and course experience. Difference in perceived learning was not significant. Also, team exam scores were significantly lower in the gamified group, whereas individual exam scores were not significantly different. This study contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence that gamification in classroom may produce unintended consequences and implementing gamification restrictively to assessment is ineffective at best. Directions for further research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hee Yoon Kwon & Koray Özpolat, 2021. "The Dark Side of Narrow Gamification: Negative Impact of Assessment Gamification on Student Perceptions and Content Knowledge," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 67-81, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:21:y:2021:i:2:p:67-81
    DOI: 10.1287/ited.2019.0227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2019.0227
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ited.2019.0227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nan Kong, 2019. "Active Game‐Based Learning of Dynamics Modeling and Simulation in Biomedical Systems Engineering," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 16-25, September.
    2. E. Renée Cantwell & Jeanann Sousou & Yuri T. Jadotte & Jenny Pierce & Leo E. Akioyamen, 2017. "PROTOCOL: Collaborative Testing for Improving Student Learning Outcomes and Test‐Taking Performance in Higher Education: A Systematic Review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18.
    3. E. Renée Cantwell & Jeanann Sousou & Yuri T. Jadotte & Jenny Pierce & Leo E. Akioyamen, 2017. "PROTOCOL: Collaborative Testing for Improving Student Learning Outcomes and Test‐Taking Performance in Higher Education: A Systematic Review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Bhardwaj, Shikha & Pereira, Vijay & del Giudice, Manlio & Zhang, Justin, 2024. "Examining the failure of gamification in implementing innovation from the perspective of problematization in the retail sectors of emerging economies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taher Ahmadi & Bo van der Rhee, 2023. "Multiobjective Line Balancing Game: Collaboration and Peer Evaluation," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 179-195, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:21:y:2021:i:2:p:67-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.