IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v6y1995i1p73-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research Report ---The Importance of Specification in Causal Modeling: The Case of End-User Computing Satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Wynne W. Chin

    (Faculty of Management, Management Information Systems Area, The University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4)

  • Peter R. Newsted

    (Faculty of Management, Management Information Systems Area, The University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4)

Abstract

In a survey of IS instruments spanning the years 1973 to 1988 (Zmud and Boynton [Zmud, R. W., A. C. Boynton. 1991. Survey measures and instruments in MIS inventory and appraisal. K. I. Kraemer, ed. The Information Systems Research Challenge Survey Research Methods , Vol. 3. Harvard Business School, Boston, 149--180.]), Doll and Torkzadeh's (Doll, W. J., G. Torkzadeh. 1988. The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quart. (June) 259--274.) 12-item End-User Computing Satisfaction instrument was reported as one of three IS instruments that met conditions to qualify as “well developed.” Recently, Etezadi-Amoli and Farhoomand (Etezadi-Amoli, J., A. F. Farhoomand. 1991. Issues and opinions on end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quart. (March) 1--5.) questioned the validity of these measures. Part of their critique centered on the poor model fit obtained in a re-analysis using LISREL. While other potentially valid points were raised by Etezadi-Amoli and Farhoomand's critique, this report focuses only on their use of confirmatory factor analysis. In our re-analyses of Doll and Torkzadeh's original covariance measures, we show how model fit is extremely dependent on model specification. While still maintaining the same number of constructs and respective measures, we demonstrate how two alternatives to the original model analyzed by Etezadi-Amoli and Farhoomand can result in models with acceptable fits.

Suggested Citation

  • Wynne W. Chin & Peter R. Newsted, 1995. "Research Report ---The Importance of Specification in Causal Modeling: The Case of End-User Computing Satisfaction," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 73-81, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:6:y:1995:i:1:p:73-81
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.6.1.73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.1.73
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.6.1.73?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kathy A. Stewart & Albert H. Segars, 2002. "An Empirical Examination of the Concern for Information Privacy Instrument," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 36-49, March.
    2. Andrew Burton-Jones & Detmar W. Straub, 2006. "Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 228-246, September.
    3. Abdelrahim Ate & Samar Zaineldeen & Sara M. Awaad, 2024. "The Factors that Influence the Turnover Intentions in Developing Countries," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 67(2), pages 407-442, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:6:y:1995:i:1:p:73-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.