IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v5y1994i2p75-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems Planning: An Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • G. Premkumar

    (College of Business, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011)

  • William R. King

    (Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260)

Abstract

Information Systems (IS) planning has gained considerable interest among researchers and practitioners in recent years because of the large investments that firms have made in IS and the increasingly strategic nature of the impact of information systems on organizational performance. Since IS planning is performed in an organizational context, characteristics of the organization may have a significant influence on the quality and effectiveness of the IS planning process. A research model is developed that links two major dimensions of IS planning—the quality of the planning process and planning effectiveness—with a set of eight organizational factors derived from contingency research in IS planning, strategic business planning, organizational studies, and technology innovation. The model is validated using data collected from a field survey of 249 senior IS executives. Canonical correlation analysis is used to test the research hypotheses and validate the model.The results of the study indicate that the two planning dimensions respectively reflecting the “means” and “ends” of IS planning are equally important. The results also indicate that planning resources, the intended strategic impact of IS on future business operations, the quality of facilitation mechanisms, the quality of implementation mechanisms, and the quality of strategic business planning are significantly associated with the quality and effectiveness of IS planning.The implications of the results to further research and to managerial practice are highlighted.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Premkumar & William R. King, 1994. "Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems Planning: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 75-109, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:5:y:1994:i:2:p:75-109
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.5.2.75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.5.2.75
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.5.2.75?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David, Albert, 2001. "Models implementation: A state of the art," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(3), pages 459-480, November.
    2. Ravi Seethamraju, 2005. "Enterprise Resource Planning Systems — Implications for Managers and Management," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 15(37), pages 90-96, November.
    3. Wang, Eric T. G., 2001. "Linking organizational context with structure: a preliminary investigation of the information processing view," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 429-443, October.
    4. King, William R. & Teo, Thompson S. H., 2000. "Assessing the impact of proactive versus reactive modes of strategic information systems planning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 667-679, December.
    5. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Papadopoulos, Thanos & Dubey, Rameshwar & Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Childe, Stephen J. & Hazen, Benjamin & Akter, Shahriar, 2017. "Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 308-317.
    6. Rameshwar Dubey & David J. Bryde & Cyril Foropon & Gary Graham & Mihalis Giannakis & Deepa Bhatt Mishra, 2022. "Agility in humanitarian supply chain: an organizational information processing perspective and relational view," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 559-579, December.
    7. Chi, Lei & Jones, Kiku G. & Lederer, Albert L. & Li, Pengtao & Newkirk, Henry E. & Sethi, Vijay, 2005. "Environmental assessment in strategic information systems planning," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 253-269.
    8. Petrache Alexandru Constantin, 2015. "Logistics - Evolution Through Innovation," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 1141-1148, July.
    9. Rameshwar Dubey & Angappa Gunasekaran & Stephen J. Childe & Thanos Papadopoulos & Zongwei Luo & David Roubaud, 2020. "Upstream supply chain visibility and complexity effect on focal company’s sustainable performance: Indian manufacturers’ perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 343-367, July.
    10. Cohen, Jason F. & Toleman, Mark, 2006. "The IS–business relationship and its implications for performance: An empirical study of South African and Australian organisations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 457-468.
    11. Albert H. Segars & Varun Grover, 1999. "Profiles of Strategic Information Systems Planning," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 199-232, September.
    12. Rajiv Sabherwal & Yolande E. Chan, 2001. "Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 11-33, March.
    13. Suri, Pradeep Kumar & Sushil,, 2022. "Effectiveness of strategy implementation and e-governance performance," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Catherine L. Wang, 2008. "Entrepreneurial Orientation, Learning Orientation, and Firm Performance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(4), pages 635-657, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:5:y:1994:i:2:p:75-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.