IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v3y1992i4p379-400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Evaluation Metrics for Information Systems Development: A Principal-Agent Model

Author

Listed:
  • Rajiv D. Banker

    (Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455)

  • Chris F. Kemerer

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 50 Memorial Drive, E53-315, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142-1347)

Abstract

The information systems (IS) development activity in large organizations is a source of increasing cost and concern to management. IS development projects are often over-budget, late, costly to maintain, and not done to the satisfaction of the requesting user. These problems exist, in part, due to the organization of the IS development process, where information systems development is typically assigned by the user (principal) to a systems developer (agent). These two parties do not have perfectly congruent goals, and therefore a contract is developed to specify their relationship. An inability to directly monitor the agent requires the use of performance measures, or metrics, to represent the agent's actions to the principal. The use of multiple measures is necessary given the multi-dimensional nature of successful systems development. In practice such contracts are difficult to develop satisfactorily, due in part to an inability to specify appropriate metrics. This paper develops a principal-agent model that provides a set of decision criteria for the principal to use to develop an incentive compatible contract for the agent. These criteria include the precision and the sensitivity of the performance metric. After presenting the formal model, some current software development metrics are discussed to illustrate how the model can be used to provide a theoretical foundation and a formal vocabulary for performance metric analysis. The model is also used in a positive (descriptive) manner to explain why current practice emphasizes metrics that possess relatively high levels of sensitivity and precision. Finally, some suggestions are made for the improvement of current metrics based upon these criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajiv D. Banker & Chris F. Kemerer, 1992. "Performance Evaluation Metrics for Information Systems Development: A Principal-Agent Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 379-400, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:3:y:1992:i:4:p:379-400
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.3.4.379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.4.379
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.3.4.379?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rajiv D. Banker & Gordon B. Davis & Sandra A. Slaughter, 1998. "Software Development Practices, Software Complexity, and Software Maintenance Performance: A Field Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 433-450, April.
    2. Yasin Ceran & Milind Dawande & Dengpan Liu & Vijay Mookerjee, 2014. "Optimal Software Reuse in Incremental Software Development: A Transfer Pricing Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 541-559, March.
    3. Sinan Aral & Erik Brynjolfsson & Lynn Wu, 2012. "Three-Way Complementarities: Performance Pay, Human Resource Analytics, and Information Technology," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 913-931, May.
    4. Rajiv D. Banker & Sandra A. Slaughter, 2000. "The Moderating Effects of Structure on Volatility and Complexity in Software Enhancement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 219-240, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:3:y:1992:i:4:p:379-400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.