IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v35y2024i4p1802-1823.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managerial Response to Online Positive Reviews: Helpful or Harmful?

Author

Listed:
  • Chaoqun Deng

    (Paul H. Chook Department of Information Systems and Statistics, Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, New York 10010)

  • T. Ravichandran

    (Lally School of Management, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180)

Abstract

Managerial responses to negative reviews could be easily understood as a brand-safeguarding strategy by firms because negative reviews can damage a company’s reputation. However, it is unclear if managers should respond to positive reviews and if so, if such action helps or hurts the firm. We develop a theoretical framework to explicate the mechanisms underlying the effects of managerial responses to positive reviews on user reviewing behaviors in online platforms. We classify positive reviews into four types: one-sided affective reviews, two-sided affective reviews, one-sided instrumental reviews, and two-sided instrumental reviews. We classify managerial responses as tailored and template responses. Using natural language processing and deep learning algorithms, we extract information presented in the texts in the reviews and responses. We theorize and test which kinds of managerial responses to positive reviews are helpful and which of them are harmful. Overall, we find that a tailored response is more appropriate when responding to two-sided instrumental positive reviews and one-sided affective positive reviews, whereas template responses work for one-sided instrumental positive reviews and two-sided affective positive reviews. Not responding would be an effective strategy for mixed positive reviews. We interpret and discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings and lay out guidelines for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaoqun Deng & T. Ravichandran, 2024. "Managerial Response to Online Positive Reviews: Helpful or Harmful?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1802-1823, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:35:y:2024:i:4:p:1802-1823
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2019.0175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0175
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2019.0175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:35:y:2024:i:4:p:1802-1823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.