IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v35y2024i4p1743-1765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking Gamification Failure: A Model and Investigation of Gamified System Maladaptive Behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Shih-Lun “Allen” Tseng

    (Department of Information Systems, Monte Ahuja College of Business, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio 44115)

  • Heshan Sun

    (Division of MIS, Price College of Business, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019)

  • Radhika Santhanam

    (Division of MIS, Price College of Business, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019)

  • Shuya Lu

    (Department of Marketing, Monte Ahuja College of Business, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio 44115)

  • Jason B. Thatcher

    (Division of Organizational Leadership, Information, and Analytics, Leeds School of Business, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309)

Abstract

Despite the increasing interest in gamified systems and excitement about their potential positive impact on user engagement, a few studies have started to note gamification failures, which can result from user maladaptive behaviors, or behaviors directed at misappropriating gamified systems. In this research, we examine how such maladaptive behaviors can result from design issues of gamified systems and how such behaviors impact task performance. To date, little is known about design issues which may drive users to maladapt, and why they maladapt gamified systems. We systematically conceptualize gamified system maladaptive behaviors (GSMB) as having two dimensions: technology maladaptation and gamified task maladaptation. Based on goal-setting theory and self-determination theory, we develop a research model of GSMB. The model depicts three drivers of GSMB: game-task goals misalignment, game-task complexity, and gamification structure injustice, and how they fulfill or frustrate psychological innate needs (i.e., needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness), which in turn drive GSMB. We conducted two studies using different contexts. We tested the model with Study 1 empirically examining users of a gamified system, Pocket Points. With Study 2, we employed a within-subject experiment. By manipulating the design issues, we assessed the fulfillment of psychological needs induced by the gamified system. The results largely support our conceptualization of GSMB and the research model, highlighting the design issues as the main drivers of GSMB, and that the greater the GSMB, the greater the negative impact on task performance. Findings from this research have implications for both information systems research and gamification practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Shih-Lun “Allen” Tseng & Heshan Sun & Radhika Santhanam & Shuya Lu & Jason B. Thatcher, 2024. "Rethinking Gamification Failure: A Model and Investigation of Gamified System Maladaptive Behaviors," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1743-1765, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:35:y:2024:i:4:p:1743-1765
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2021.0284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0284
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2021.0284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:35:y:2024:i:4:p:1743-1765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.