IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v9y1979i2-part-1p77-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Quick and Dirty Response to the Quick and Dirty Crowd; Particularly to Jack Byrd's “The Value of Queueing Theory”

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Kolesar

    (Columbia University, New York)

Abstract

Queueing theory is a useful, important part of the tool bag of OR/MS, and any half serious professional ought to know it. To charge otherwise in a professional journal, on the basis of sending students to visit a two-clerk bookstore, seems to me absurd or malicious---take your choice. In that same bookstore I could prove that linear programming, inventory theory, network analysis, simulation, geometric programming, indeed virtually all of OR/MS is equally useless.Now, it is really very weird but over the years I've done similar experiments at Columbia with my first year OR students. Do you believe it, but the results were entirely different? In a pretty wide range of problems my students found queueing theory useful--- and one application was even to setting red-green cycles on traffic lights. How do you account for the difference---the experimentor, the subjects, the environment? Maybe, but perhaps it's just that we were not quite so quick, or quite so dirty, or trying to be quite so cute.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Kolesar, 1979. "A Quick and Dirty Response to the Quick and Dirty Crowd; Particularly to Jack Byrd's “The Value of Queueing Theory”," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 9(2-part-1), pages 77-82, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:9:y:1979:i:2-part-1:p:77-82
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.9.2pt1.77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.9.2pt1.77
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.9.2pt1.77?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:9:y:1979:i:2-part-1:p:77-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.