IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v9y1979i2-part-1p63-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capital Expenditure Decision/Making: Some Tools and Trends

Author

Listed:
  • Meir J. Rosenblatt

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

  • James V. Jucker

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

Abstract

During the past two decades, several independent surveys were conducted to determine the art and science of capital budgeting, as practiced in business and industry. This paper outlines a synthesis of the various surveys and highlights some changes and trends regarding the adoption of quantitative tools in the capital budgeting process. The topics to be discussed include the use of discounting methods, the determination of discount and cut-off rates, the use of mathematical programming and capital rationing, and approaches to risk and uncertainty in the capital budgeting process. Before beginning, three possible sources of bias in what is reported here must be acknowledged. First, the various surveys included firms which were selected using a variety of criteria. However, it is entirely possible, even likely, that some firms participated in more than one of the surveys. Second, the surveys in total contain a disproportionately large fraction of very large firms. Third, as is true in many surveys, the results reported here may well be biased by the self-selection which takes place when firms decide to participate.

Suggested Citation

  • Meir J. Rosenblatt & James V. Jucker, 1979. "Capital Expenditure Decision/Making: Some Tools and Trends," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 9(2-part-1), pages 63-69, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:9:y:1979:i:2-part-1:p:63-69
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.9.2pt1.63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.9.2pt1.63
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.9.2pt1.63?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:9:y:1979:i:2-part-1:p:63-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.