IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v9y1978i1p40-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management Science Process: EOQ---Once More with Feeling

Author

Listed:
  • Robert J. Graham

Abstract

One of the objectives of this column [Graham, Robert J. 1978. On management science process. Interfaces 8 (2, February).] is to act as a forum for endeavors aimed at combining aspects of both the behavioral and management sciences into a set of useful processes for problem identification and solution. Some authors feel that the incorporation of behavioral variables in management science models is the next step in making decision aiding models more palatable to the managers who are supposed to be using them. Some of the complaints leveled against the current state of management science are that the procedures and algorithms are too cold and calculating, based on principles such as optimization which are not a part of the management psyche, built on obscure logic and mathematics, and generally devoid of management and behavioral considerations. In short, the models lack feeling. The purpose of this article is to argue that the lack of feeling is not necessarily inherent in the use of decision-aiding models but rather is a result of the way that management scientists have come to view, teach, and use such models. The main thesis is that some simple changes in the way that we motivate, construct, and use models could go a long way towards incorporating some of the behavioral aspects of management and hopefully increasing managerial acceptance.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert J. Graham, 1978. "Management Science Process: EOQ---Once More with Feeling," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 40-44, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:9:y:1978:i:1:p:40-44
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.9.1.40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.9.1.40
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.9.1.40?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:9:y:1978:i:1:p:40-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.