IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v7y1977i2p63-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Management Science Arcane?

Author

Listed:
  • Robert J. Graham

    (The Busch Center, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania)

Abstract

As has been previously noted by Klein and Butkovich [Klein, D., P. Butkovich. 1976. Can the professions of operations research/management science change and survive? Interfaces 6 (3, May) 47--51.], “the regular reader of Interfaces has been confronted with constant prophesies of trouble for the profession.” Anyone reading the May 1976 issue of Interfaces would certainly come away with the idea that OR/MS is arcane [Grayson, C. J. 1973. Management science and business practice. Harvard Bus. Rev. 51 (4, July--August).] and rapidly disintegrating. I propose to argue, however, that the opposite could be true and that subtle changes have been occurring in the profession which could result in a revitalization in the next decade. The following is a review of the articles in the May 1976 Interfaces discussing some of the causes of the lack of faith in MS/OR. Following this, some trends in the profession will be shown that may alleviate many of the previous ills, and further suggestions for progress are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert J. Graham, 1977. "Is Management Science Arcane?," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 63-67, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:7:y:1977:i:2:p:63-67
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.7.2.63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.7.2.63
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.7.2.63?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:7:y:1977:i:2:p:63-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.