IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v4y1974i2p1-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Must We Revolutionize Our Methodology?

Author

Listed:
  • Robert A. Raitt

    (Bank of Montreal)

Abstract

Concern has been widely expressed at the current state of the management sciences, both by practitioners and their clients. Some critics claim that management scientists, and particularly operations researchers, often work in isolation from the world of practical affairs, give priority to the esoteric objectives of their profession and remain more interested in the rigor of their models than in finding workable solutions to real problems. Perhaps more seriously, it is held that these disciplines have demonstrated their value in solving only a narrow range of problems which exhibit specific characteristics, for example the existence of a clearly defined objective function, and to which their portfolio of techniques applies. The capability of the management sciences to contribute significantly to today's social and political problems or to the design of our institutions is open to serious doubt. Yet, many practitioners feel that their discipline could and should make such a contribution. Moreover, many authors have expressed their expectation that this is the direction in which the profession will develop over the next ten years. Failure to achieve such a development, it is contended, will herald the decline of the management sciences, for they will have ceased to be relevant to the critical problems of the day.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert A. Raitt, 1974. "Must We Revolutionize Our Methodology?," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 4(2), pages 1-10, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:4:y:1974:i:2:p:1-10
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.4.2.1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.4.2.1
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.4.2.1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Di Giacomo, Laura & Patrizi, Giacomo, 2010. "Methodological analysis of supply chains management applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 249-257, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:4:y:1974:i:2:p:1-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.