IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v47y2017i4p305-319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Site Qualification Across the Supply Network at Western Digital

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Liao

    (Analytics Center of Excellence, Silicon Operations, Western Digital Corporation, Milpitas, California 95035)

  • Candace Arai Yano

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research and Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720)

  • Shiva Esturi

    (Supply Chain Strategy and Optimization, Silicon Operations, Western Digital Corporation, Milpitas, California 95035)

Abstract

We describe an optimization-based methodology that Western Digital implemented to support its site-qualification decisions; that is, which sites(s) are qualified to produce each of its products. Qualifying a product at a site commonly takes several months and hundreds of hours of engineering effort. These decisions are especially challenging because Western Digital Silicon Operations offers thousands of products; and demands more than a month or two into the future are very uncertain, as they are with many electronic products. Therefore, because shortages result in lost sales, the company must consider both expected demand and demand uncertainty. We solve the problem as a mixed-integer stochastic program with multiple stages of recourse, using a linear programming solver for the recourse stages and a greedy heuristic to determine the site qualifications. Western Digital deployed the model starting in the first quarter of 2015 and established a quarterly process for making site-qualification decisions. The decision support tool facilitated a more streamlined decision process and has already provided substantial savings to Western Digital.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Liao & Candace Arai Yano & Shiva Esturi, 2017. "Optimizing Site Qualification Across the Supply Network at Western Digital," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 305-319, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:47:y:2017:i:4:p:305-319
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.2017.0898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.2017.0898
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.2017.0898?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William C. Jordan & Stephen C. Graves, 1995. "Principles on the Benefits of Manufacturing Process Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 577-594, April.
    2. Stephen C. Graves & Brian T. Tomlin, 2003. "Process Flexibility in Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(7), pages 907-919, July.
    3. Santoso, Tjendera & Ahmed, Shabbir & Goetschalckx, Marc & Shapiro, Alexander, 2005. "A stochastic programming approach for supply chain network design under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 96-115, November.
    4. Chou, Mabel C. & Chua, Geoffrey A. & Teo, Chung-Piaw, 2010. "On range and response: Dimensions of process flexibility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 711-724, December.
    5. Gupta, Diwakar & Gerchak, Yigal & Buzacott, John A., 1992. "The optimal mix of flexible and dedicated manufacturing capacities: Hedging against demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 309-319, December.
    6. David Simchi-Levi & Yehua Wei, 2012. "Understanding the Performance of the Long Chain and Sparse Designs in Process Flexibility," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1125-1141, October.
    7. Jan A. Van Mieghem, 1998. "Investment Strategies for Flexible Resources," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(8), pages 1071-1078, August.
    8. Charles H. Fine & Robert M. Freund, 1990. "Optimal Investment in Product-Flexible Manufacturing Capacity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 449-466, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Perraudat, Antoine & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Vialletelle, Philippe, 2022. "Robust tactical qualification decisions in flexible manufacturing systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dipankar Bose & A. K. Chatterjee & Samir Barman, 2016. "Towards dominant flexibility configurations in strategic capacity planning under demand uncertainty," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(3), pages 604-619, September.
    2. Verma, Nishant Kumar & Chatterjee, Ashish K., 2023. "Process flexibility in the presence of product modularity: Does modularity help?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    3. Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2005. "On the Value of Mix Flexibility and Dual Sourcing in Unreliable Newsvendor Networks," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 37-57, June.
    4. Achal Bassamboo & Ramandeep S. Randhawa & Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2010. "Optimal Flexibility Configurations in Newsvendor Networks: Going Beyond Chaining and Pairing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(8), pages 1285-1303, August.
    5. Francas, David & Kremer, Mirko & Minner, Stefan & Friese, Markus, 2009. "Strategic process flexibility under lifecycle demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 427-440, October.
    6. Ebru K. Bish & Ana Muriel & Stephan Biller, 2005. "Managing Flexible Capacity in a Make-to-Order Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 167-180, February.
    7. Yangyang Peng & Xiaolin Xu & Xue Liang & Weili Xue, 2020. "Mismatch risk allocation in a coproduct supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 707-730, August.
    8. Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2008. "Pricing and Operational Recourse in Coproduction Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 522-537, March.
    9. Wallace J. Hopp & Seyed M. R. Iravani & Wendy Lu Xu, 2010. "Vertical Flexibility in Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 495-502, March.
    10. Elena Katok & William Tarantino & Terry P. Harrison, 2003. "Investment in production resource flexibility: An empirical investigation of methods for planning under uncertainty," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(2), pages 105-129, March.
    11. Rujeerapaiboon, Napat & Zhong, Yuanguang & Zhu, Dan, 2023. "Resilience of long chain under disruption," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 597-615.
    12. Jörn Grahl & Michael Schneider & David Francas, 2010. "A Problem-Specific and Effective Metaheuristic for Flexibility Design," Working Papers 1001, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, revised 28 Jan 2010.
    13. Soroush Saghafian & Mark P. Van Oyen, 2016. "Compensating for Dynamic Supply Disruptions: Backup Flexibility Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 390-405, April.
    14. Jingui Xie & Yiming Fan & Mabel C. Chou, 2017. "Flexibility design in loss and queueing systems: efficiency of k-chain configuration," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 286-308, June.
    15. Chandra, Charu & Everson, Mark & Grabis, Janis, 2005. "Evaluation of enterprise-level benefits of manufacturing flexibility," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 17-31, February.
    16. Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2007. "Risk Mitigation in Newsvendor Networks: Resource Diversification, Flexibility, Sharing, and Hedging," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(8), pages 1269-1288, August.
    17. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    18. Achal Bassamboo & Ramandeep S. Randhawa & Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2012. "A Little Flexibility Is All You Need: On the Asymptotic Value of Flexible Capacity in Parallel Queuing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1423-1435, December.
    19. Manu Goyal & Serguei Netessine, 2007. "Strategic Technology Choice and Capacity Investment Under Demand Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 192-207, February.
    20. Timothy C. Y. Chan & Douglas Fearing, 2019. "Process Flexibility in Baseball: The Value of Positional Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1642-1666, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:47:y:2017:i:4:p:305-319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.