IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v35y2005i5p425-428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Editorial: The Sixth Interfaces Ranking of Universities’ Contributions to the Practice Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Michael H. Rothkopf

    (MSIS Department and RUTCOR, Rutgers University, 640 Bartholomew Road, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8003)

Abstract

For the sixth time, I rank universities according to their contributions to the practice literature. I trace the evolution of the rankings of the top universities. Carnegie Mellon University is now top ranked. Erasmus University is now the top-ranked non-US university. For the first time, the practice publication rate of the top-ranked universities is higher than it was in the immediately preceding ranking.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael H. Rothkopf, 2005. "Editorial: The Sixth Interfaces Ranking of Universities’ Contributions to the Practice Literature," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 425-428, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:35:y:2005:i:5:p:425-428
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.1050.0159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.1050.0159
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.1050.0159?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael H. Rothkopf, 1999. "Editorial: The Third Interfaces Ranking of Universities' Contributions to the Practice Literature," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 107-111, December.
    2. Michael H. Rothkopf, 1996. "Editorial: Which Universities Contribute to the Practice Literature? The First Interfaces Ranking," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 16-21, April.
    3. Michael H. Rothkopf, 1997. "Editorial: Which Universities Contribute to the Practice Literature? The Second Interfaces Ranking," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 19-22, August.
    4. Michael H. Rothkopf, 2004. "Editorial: The Fifth Interfaces Ranking of Universities’ Contributions to the Practice Literature," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 135-138, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael F. Gorman, 2016. "Editorial: The 11th Rothkopf Rankings: 28 Years of Tracking Applied Research in Academia," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 264-276, June.
    2. Ronald D. Fricker, 2011. "Editorial: The Ninth Rothkopf Rankings of Universities' Contributions to the INFORMS Practice Literature," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 41(6), pages 590-598, December.
    3. Ronald D. Fricker, 2009. "Editorial: The Eighth Rothkopf Rankings of Universities' Contributions to the INFORMS Practice Literature," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 533-539, December.
    4. Michael F. Gorman, 2019. "Editorial: The 12th Rothkopf Rankings," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 295-303, July.
    5. Laure Cabantous & Gilbert Laporte, 2015. "ASP, The Art and Science of Practice: Academia-Industry Interfacing in Operations Research in Montréal," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 45(6), pages 554-566, December.
    6. Michael H. Rothkopf, 2007. "Editorial: The Seventh Interfaces Ranking of Universities' Contributions to the Practice Literature," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(6), pages 566-569, December.
    7. Ronald D. Fricker, 2012. "Editorial: The First Rothkopf Rankings of Nonacademic Organizations," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 585-590, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael F. Gorman, 2016. "Editorial: The 11th Rothkopf Rankings: 28 Years of Tracking Applied Research in Academia," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 264-276, June.
    2. Michael F. Gorman, 2019. "Editorial: The 12th Rothkopf Rankings," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 295-303, July.
    3. Ronald D. Fricker, 2012. "Editorial: The First Rothkopf Rankings of Nonacademic Organizations," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 585-590, December.
    4. Michael H. Rothkopf, 2007. "Editorial: The Seventh Interfaces Ranking of Universities' Contributions to the Practice Literature," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(6), pages 566-569, December.
    5. Ronald D. Fricker, 2009. "Editorial: The Eighth Rothkopf Rankings of Universities' Contributions to the INFORMS Practice Literature," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 533-539, December.
    6. Ronald D. Fricker, 2011. "Editorial: The Ninth Rothkopf Rankings of Universities' Contributions to the INFORMS Practice Literature," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 41(6), pages 590-598, December.
    7. Vastag, Gyula & Montabon, Frank, 2002. "Journal characteristics, rankings and social acculturation in operations management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 109-126, April.
    8. Ormerod, R. J., 2000. "Is content analysis either practical or desirable for research evaluation?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 241-245, April.
    9. Laure Cabantous & Gilbert Laporte, 2015. "ASP, The Art and Science of Practice: Academia-Industry Interfacing in Operations Research in Montréal," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 45(6), pages 554-566, December.
    10. Ronald D. Fricker, 2013. "Editorial: The 10th Rothkopf Rankings of Universities’ Contributions to the INFORMS Practice Literature," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 43(6), pages 572-577, December.
    11. Gerald G. Brown & Walter C. DeGrange & Robert F. Dell & Ronald D. Fricker, 2015. "ASP, Art and Science of Practice: Educating Military Operations Research Practitioners," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 175-186, April.
    12. Donohue, Joan M. & Fox, Jeremy B., 2000. "A multi-method evaluation of journals in the decision and management sciences by US academics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 17-36, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    professional: comments on;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:35:y:2005:i:5:p:425-428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.